Biggest population changes in Sirsa district
Computed from 296 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Sirsa district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramnagar(206) | 181 | 400 | +121.0% |
| 2 | Bukhara Khera(218) | 289 | 625 | +116.3% |
| 3 | Makha(301) | 1,452 | 3,000 | +106.6% |
| 4 | Panihari(162) | 4,788 | 9,200 | +92.2% |
| 5 | Chattargarh patti(80) | 2,214 | 4,250 | +92.0% |
| 6 | Karamgarh(195) | 1,753 | 3,300 | +88.3% |
| 7 | Dhol Palia(115) | 4,082 | 7,684 | +88.2% |
| 8 | Burj Karamgarh(159) | 991 | 1,800 | +81.6% |
| 9 | Rori(167) | 11,997 | 21,200 | +76.7% |
| 10 | Nehrana (16) | 2,995 | 5,000 | +66.9% |
| 11 | Patti Kirpal(133) | 513 | 854 | +66.5% |
| 12 | Kanganpur(78) | 3,081 | 5,083 | +65.0% |
| 13 | Rania(137) | 3,105 | 5,082 | +63.7% |
| 14 | Darban Kalan(30) | 4,374 | 6,700 | +53.2% |
| 15 | Darbi(69) | 4,561 | 6,986 | +53.2% |
| 16 | Bhadra(186) | 1,942 | 2,908 | +49.7% |
| 17 | Bhavdeen(65) | 6,347 | 9,500 | +49.7% |
| 18 | Ramgarh(245) | 1,980 | 2,900 | +46.5% |
| 19 | Bakarianwali(40) | 4,156 | 6,000 | +44.4% |
| 20 | Rupana Urf Darban Khurd(28) | 2,318 | 3,300 | +42.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Sirsa district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dhani Jatan(117) | 4,031 | 2,494 | -38.1% |
| 2 | Sainpal(235) | 2,984 | 1,905 | -36.2% |
| 3 | Nezia Khera(44) | 3,909 | 2,598 | -33.5% |
| 4 | Abholi(138) | 4,175 | 2,964 | -29.0% |
| 5 | Jagmalwali(309) | 4,828 | 3,500 | -27.5% |
| 6 | Nakora(128) | 2,203 | 1,624 | -26.3% |
| 7 | Rangri Khera(87) | 2,681 | 2,010 | -25.0% |
| 8 | Mamera(131) | 4,357 | 3,308 | -24.1% |
| 9 | Farwain(158) | 4,598 | 3,576 | -22.2% |
| 10 | Talwara Khurd-1 (120) | 8,399 | 6,717 | -20.0% |
| 11 | Ottu(139) | 5,964 | 4,835 | -18.9% |
| 12 | Jhopra(153) | 1,074 | 876 | -18.4% |
| 13 | Ferozabad(99) | 2,407 | 1,978 | -17.8% |
| 14 | Jhorar Nali(145) | 6,256 | 5,200 | -16.9% |
| 15 | Kumthal(327) | 2,102 | 1,789 | -14.9% |
| 16 | Shamshabad(82) | 1,190 | 1,015 | -14.7% |
| 17 | Rampur Their(330) | 2,395 | 2,046 | -14.6% |
| 18 | Dabwali (Rural)(Part)(278) | 7,458 | 6,458 | -13.4% |
| 19 | Fatehpur Vaidwala(76) | 5,016 | 4,403 | -12.2% |
| 20 | Kotli(64) | 8,027 | 7,086 | -11.7% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.