Nichar block
Kinnaur district, Himachal Pradesh · 95 villages
Villages
95
Average change
+25.6%
across 52 measurable villages
Population 2011 → 2020
17,013 → 20,252
compared villages only
Villages in this block
| Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agade (31/ 7) | 54 | — | unreliable |
| Bagantu Dhar (47) | — | — | — |
| Bai | 136 | 173 | +27.2% |
| Bara Kamba (7/3) | 564 | 621 | +10.1% |
| Baro (32/2) | 149 | 275 | +84.6% |
| Basharang (8/1) | 8 | — | unreliable |
| Burang (1/10) | 150 | — | unreliable |
| Burcha (67/3) | 151 | 126 | -16.6% |
| Change (35/2) | 584 | — | unreliable |
| Chaura (37/1) | 355 | 216 | -39.1% |
| Chhonda (36/4) | 94 | 82 | -12.8% |
| Chhota Kamba (8/2) | 401 | 394 | -1.8% |
| Cholling (104/2) | 514 | 355 | -30.9% |
| D.P.F. C-85 (69) | — | — | — |
| D.P.F. Kagsthal 128 B-129 (76) | — | — | — |
| D.P.F.Chhota Kamba Doyam C-96 (10) | 8 | — | unreliable |
| DPF-71A | — | — | — |
| Dabling (1/7) | 77 | 151 | +96.1% |
| Dhar Barke (11) | — | — | — |
| Dharmaling (91/1) | 924 | — | unreliable |
| Garade (31/8) | 414 | 555 | +34.1% |
| Ghumaruning (104/3) | 78 | 74 | -5.1% |
| Gramang (35/4) | 393 | 478 | +21.6% |
| Homte (30/2) | 160 | 145 | -9.4% |
| Huri (30/3) | 185 | 375 | +102.7% |
| Hurwa | 121 | 145 | +19.8% |
| Jani (86/1) | 414 | 714 | +72.5% |
| Jogtiyaring | 217 | 294 | +35.5% |
| Kachrang (14/5) | 160 | 205 | +28.1% |
| Kafaur (37/2) | 213 | 194 | -8.9% |
| Kafnu (30/1) | 824 | 761 | -7.7% |
| Kagsthal (75/2) | 17 | — | unreliable |
| Kandar (17) | 186 | 275 | +47.9% |
| Kangarang (30/15) | 40 | 51 | +27.5% |
| Kangarang (91/ 7) | — | — | — |
| Kangos (33) | 595 | 360 | -39.5% |
| Karaba (30/13) | 260 | 280 | +7.7% |
| Karape (36/2) | 73 | — | unreliable |
| Kashpo (31/9) | 523 | 379 | -27.5% |
| Katgaon (30/7) | 704 | 590 | -16.2% |
| Kutano (100/2) | 507 | 580 | +14.4% |
| Linge (31/6) | 71 | — | unreliable |
| Majhgaon (1/2) | 584 | 696 | +19.2% |
| Masrang (30/4) | 18 | — | unreliable |
| Meeru Khas (104/1) | 471 | 629 | +33.5% |
| Nainsaring (1/5) | 6 | — | unreliable |
| Nanaspo (36/3) | 261 | 373 | +42.9% |
| Nathpa (16) | 356 | 559 | +57.0% |
| Nigani (31/5) | 472 | 630 | +33.5% |
| Nigulsari | 784 | — | unreliable |
| Palingi (34/1) | 463 | 305 | -34.1% |
| Panvi Khas | 1,342 | 846 | -37.0% |
| Paring Khor (31/1) | 10 | — | unreliable |
| Pashpa (1/9) | 29 | 45 | +55.2% |
| Phaktayowar Dhar (67/5) | — | — | — |
| Ponda (34/2) | 172 | 135 | -21.5% |
| Puje (31/10) | 608 | — | unreliable |
| Punang Khas (90/1) | 1,282 | — | unreliable |
| Punaspa (32/3) | 50 | — | unreliable |
| Raag Panung (91/4) | 191 | — | unreliable |
| Rall Santhang (100/3) | 57 | — | unreliable |
| Ralpa (34/3) | 118 | — | unreliable |
| Ramni Khas (75/1) | 427 | 690 | +61.6% |
| Rango (31/4) | — | — | — |
| Rango (35/3) | — | — | — |
| Rarang (30/11) | 793 | — | unreliable |
| Rawa (35/5) | — | — | — |
| Rithachang Dhar (63) | — | — | — |
| Rock Charang (14/2) | 56 | 80 | +42.9% |
| Runang Nichla (104/4) | 231 | 211 | -8.7% |
| Runang Uperla (111) | — | — | — |
| Saki Charang (32/1) | 293 | 361 | +23.2% |
| Shagarcha (1/4) | 207 | 190 | -8.2% |
| Shaling Dhar (23) | — | — | — |
| Shaling Dhar (67/4) | — | — | — |
| Shango (30/12) | 396 | 448 | +13.1% |
| Shilani (37/3) | 202 | 217 | +7.4% |
| Shorang (7/1) | 111 | — | unreliable |
| Shunathachang Dhar (98) | — | — | — |
| Solaring | 28 | 35 | +25.0% |
| Solding (35/1) | 155 | 300 | +93.5% |
| Somo (31/2) | — | — | — |
| Sungra (32/4) | 2,669 | — | unreliable |
| Surcho (30/14) | 73 | 100 | +37.0% |
| Tapri (91/3) | 1,085 | — | unreliable |
| Thachh (36/7) | 101 | 214 | +111.9% |
| Tikrang (36/5) | 11 | 12 | +9.1% |
| Tranda (36/1) | 249 | 424 | +70.3% |
| Urabaning (91/2) | 87 | — | unreliable |
| Urni Khas (100/1) | 500 | — | unreliable |
| Yangpa (30/6) | 1,274 | 2,572 | +101.9% |
| Yashang (91/5) | 296 | 737 | +149.0% |
| Yashang Dhar (93) | 92 | — | unreliable |
| Yotrang (30/9) | — | — | — |
| Yulla Khas (102/1) | 429 | 595 | +38.7% |
Blocks are the administrative tier between district and village. The block a village belongs to comes from the Local Government Directory via the 2020 survey, so it reflects boundaries as of 2020, not 2011.