Biggest population changes in Kinnaur district
Computed from 122 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kinnaur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asrang Khas (7/1) | 338 | 842 | +149.1% |
| 2 | Yashang (91/5) | 296 | 737 | +149.0% |
| 3 | Thikru (2/2) | 121 | 300 | +147.9% |
| 4 | Up Mohal Kanam Khas (6/1) | 527 | 1,250 | +137.2% |
| 5 | Thachh (36/7) | 101 | 214 | +111.9% |
| 6 | Hangmat (7/2) | 163 | 331 | +103.1% |
| 7 | Huri (30/3) | 185 | 375 | +102.7% |
| 8 | Yangpa (30/6) | 1,274 | 2,572 | +101.9% |
| 9 | Radule (20/2) | 191 | 382 | +100.0% |
| 10 | Swaden (34/7) | 142 | 284 | +100.0% |
| 11 | Solding (35/1) | 155 | 300 | +93.5% |
| 12 | Baro (32/2) | 149 | 275 | +84.6% |
| 13 | Up Mohal Ropakhas (43/1) | 349 | 638 | +82.8% |
| 14 | Thangi Khas (53/1) | 636 | 1,102 | +73.3% |
| 15 | Jani (86/1) | 414 | 714 | +72.5% |
| 16 | Tranda (36/1) | 249 | 424 | +70.3% |
| 17 | Up Mohal Labrang Khas (3/1) | 585 | 983 | +68.0% |
| 18 | Shenan Den (13/2) | 167 | 277 | +65.9% |
| 19 | Kupa (33/2) | 521 | 845 | +62.2% |
| 20 | Ramni Khas (75/1) | 427 | 690 | +61.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Kinnaur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chaura (37/1) | 355 | 216 | -39.1% |
| 2 | Akpa Khas (33/1) | 470 | 289 | -38.5% |
| 3 | Kalpa (20/1) | 1,236 | 771 | -37.6% |
| 4 | Kilba Khas (2/1) | 1,473 | 919 | -37.6% |
| 5 | Panvi Khas | 1,342 | 846 | -37.0% |
| 6 | Ribba Khas (40/1) | 894 | 580 | -35.1% |
| 7 | Palingi (34/1) | 463 | 305 | -34.1% |
| 8 | Maki Mrang (13/2) | 190 | 130 | -31.6% |
| 9 | Cholling (104/2) | 514 | 355 | -30.9% |
| 10 | Jangi Khas (28/1) | 1,175 | 817 | -30.5% |
| 11 | Kothi (15/1) | 1,638 | 1,185 | -27.7% |
| 12 | Kashpo (31/9) | 523 | 379 | -27.5% |
| 13 | Up Mohal Spiloo Khas (1/1) | 757 | 576 | -23.9% |
| 14 | Shuda Rang (20/4) | 843 | 659 | -21.8% |
| 15 | Ponda (34/2) | 172 | 135 | -21.5% |
| 16 | Tokto (7/2) | 175 | 146 | -16.6% |
| 17 | Burcha (67/3) | 151 | 126 | -16.6% |
| 18 | Sangla (34/1) | 2,244 | 1,877 | -16.4% |
| 19 | Katgaon (30/7) | 704 | 590 | -16.2% |
| 20 | Dhar Chango Uperla (29/1) | 797 | 711 | -10.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
28 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
30 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.