Biggest population changes in Sirmaur district
Computed from 805 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Sirmaur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mirpur-Gurdwara (136) | 405 | 963 | +137.8% |
| 2 | Maina Gharail (106) | 671 | 1,550 | +131.0% |
| 3 | Kandon Kathar (52) | 282 | 637 | +125.9% |
| 4 | Tikri Jajah (134) | 132 | 293 | +122.0% |
| 5 | Balsar (13) | 179 | 394 | +120.1% |
| 6 | Methli (27) | 143 | 307 | +114.7% |
| 7 | Bhat-Ka-Saina (106) | 279 | 597 | +114.0% |
| 8 | Bindla Digwa (191) | 896 | 1,907 | +112.8% |
| 9 | Dharam Kot (122) | 389 | 826 | +112.3% |
| 10 | Reri Gusan (133) | 589 | 1,230 | +108.8% |
| 11 | Nao Barwa (22) | 180 | 372 | +106.7% |
| 12 | Katyana Serta (207) | 117 | 240 | +105.1% |
| 13 | Gatu Nawi (82) | 148 | 300 | +102.7% |
| 14 | Sathaur (13) | 282 | 560 | +98.6% |
| 15 | Bhalaona (161) | 508 | 991 | +95.1% |
| 16 | Mangarh (178) | 753 | 1,466 | +94.7% |
| 17 | Ghanduri (132) | 908 | 1,755 | +93.3% |
| 18 | Pab (210) | 266 | 503 | +89.1% |
| 19 | Gabar (14) | 206 | 387 | +87.9% |
| 20 | Kiyana (212) | 429 | 800 | +86.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Sirmaur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dharwa (183) | 1,008 | 610 | -39.5% |
| 2 | Thaliga Lahan (53) | 241 | 146 | -39.4% |
| 3 | Chaloga Byas (140) | 151 | 92 | -39.1% |
| 4 | Bhanra (129) | 400 | 250 | -37.5% |
| 5 | Sampda Shubh Khera (113) | 419 | 263 | -37.2% |
| 6 | Kahan (240) | 388 | 247 | -36.3% |
| 7 | Nabgarh Kharana (234) | 222 | 142 | -36.0% |
| 8 | Bogariyah (121) | 334 | 215 | -35.6% |
| 9 | Gundahan (194) | 3,828 | 2,495 | -34.8% |
| 10 | Boharli (14) | 100 | 66 | -34.0% |
| 11 | Patti Natha Singh (112) | 372 | 252 | -32.3% |
| 12 | Naina Chhadyar (387) | 361 | 245 | -32.1% |
| 13 | Baru Sarera (149) | 3,329 | 2,268 | -31.9% |
| 14 | Jagatpur (147) | 1,050 | 730 | -30.5% |
| 15 | Milla Magnal (192) | 2,102 | 1,496 | -28.8% |
| 16 | Khairi (137) | 971 | 699 | -28.0% |
| 17 | Rampur Jatan (139) | 1,353 | 990 | -26.8% |
| 18 | Soda Dhayari (161) | 516 | 380 | -26.4% |
| 19 | Sangrah (118) | 2,028 | 1,500 | -26.0% |
| 20 | Fatehpur Sadhori (123) | 518 | 388 | -25.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
106 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
106 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.