Biggest population changes in Bandipora district
Computed from 54 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Bandipora district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kani Pora | 1,094 | 2,665 | +143.6% |
| 2 | Jurnial | 830 | 1,925 | +131.9% |
| 3 | Sari Hari Karan Gund | 1,729 | 3,920 | +126.7% |
| 4 | Gaad Khud | 2,007 | 4,500 | +124.2% |
| 5 | Buglinder | 905 | 2,000 | +121.0% |
| 6 | Puranatulail | 695 | 1,495 | +115.1% |
| 7 | Khayar | 1,630 | 3,319 | +103.6% |
| 8 | Soner Wani | 1,855 | 3,500 | +88.7% |
| 9 | Rakh Sultan Pora | 2,613 | 4,900 | +87.5% |
| 10 | Takiya Ahmad Shah | 946 | 1,700 | +79.7% |
| 11 | Panjigam | 1,677 | 3,000 | +78.9% |
| 12 | Poshwari | 2,238 | 3,900 | +74.3% |
| 13 | Chak Arsala Khan | 1,036 | 1,800 | +73.8% |
| 14 | Madwan | 2,215 | 3,800 | +71.6% |
| 15 | Chewa | 3,278 | 5,412 | +65.1% |
| 16 | Saradaab | 1,230 | 2,000 | +62.6% |
| 17 | Zal Pora | 2,191 | 3,500 | +59.7% |
| 18 | Gund i Khalil | 2,164 | 3,371 | +55.8% |
| 19 | Lawaypora | 2,197 | 3,319 | +51.1% |
| 20 | Kharpora | 2,127 | 3,200 | +50.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Bandipora district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kudara | 2,455 | 1,500 | -38.9% |
| 2 | Nowgam | 5,836 | 3,680 | -36.9% |
| 3 | Arin Dard Pora | 6,234 | 3,962 | -36.5% |
| 4 | Shah Gund | 7,044 | 4,501 | -36.1% |
| 5 | Garoora | 3,528 | 2,300 | -34.8% |
| 6 | Asham | 4,841 | 3,214 | -33.6% |
| 7 | Qazipora Putushai | 7,229 | 4,850 | -32.9% |
| 8 | Kehnoosa | 5,271 | 3,642 | -30.9% |
| 9 | Onagam | 5,373 | 3,993 | -25.7% |
| 10 | Kanzalwan Nail | 1,930 | 1,480 | -23.3% |
| 11 | Aragam | 3,020 | 2,385 | -21.0% |
| 12 | Shilvat | 2,461 | 1,984 | -19.4% |
| 13 | Trigam | 4,485 | 3,620 | -19.3% |
| 14 | Ahemshreif | 1,535 | 1,269 | -17.3% |
| 15 | Rakh Shilvat | 3,771 | 3,212 | -14.8% |
| 16 | Ganastan | 4,220 | 3,640 | -13.7% |
| 17 | Mangnipora | 4,021 | 3,500 | -13.0% |
| 18 | Vijipara | 3,243 | 2,951 | -9.0% |
| 19 | Chuntimulla | 2,823 | 2,600 | -7.9% |
| 20 | Hilalabad | 4,723 | 4,500 | -4.7% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.