GaonData

Biggest population changes in Ganderbal district

Computed from 81 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Ganderbal district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gogji Gund Sherpathri 574 1,430 +149.1%
2 Dangarpora Lar 600 1,430 +138.3%
3 Dard Wooder Kangan 798 1,892 +137.1%
4 Bamlina Kangan 278 599 +115.5%
5 Seh Pora Sherpathri 2,250 4,700 +108.9%
6 Gamwara Wakoora 349 699 +100.3%
7 Gund Rehman Sherpathri 1,012 1,806 +78.5%
8 Khanan Kangan 1,731 3,056 +76.5%
9 Gulab Bagh Safapora 1,214 2,142 +76.4%
10 YechHama Kangan 1,082 1,864 +72.3%
11 Hatbara Sherpathri 1,039 1,779 +71.2%
12 Tangchatter Kangan 375 630 +68.0%
13 Bat Pora Wakoora 853 1,372 +60.8%
14 Chinner Kangan 1,007 1,602 +59.1%
15 Baghi Zaman Ganie Lar 161 250 +55.3%
16 Pehli Pora Safapora 3,010 4,640 +54.1%
17 Watalbagh Lar 1,229 1,830 +48.9%
18 Barwalla Kangan 1,337 1,975 +47.7%
19 Kosturipora Sherpathri 346 506 +46.2%
20 Arhama Lar 2,112 2,950 +39.7%

Villages that shrank most in Ganderbal district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gund Sarsingh Gund 3,688 2,280 -38.2%
2 Akhal Kangan 4,053 2,506 -38.2%
3 Gagangeer Gund 2,755 1,750 -36.5%
4 Chunt Waliwar Lar 5,950 4,012 -32.6%
5 Hari Pora Lar 4,026 2,740 -31.9%
6 Shallabugh Sherpathri 5,229 3,560 -31.9%
7 Chattergul Kangan 7,641 5,213 -31.8%
8 Wangat Kangan 6,616 4,516 -31.7%
9 Kangan Kangan 5,985 4,086 -31.7%
10 Thune Kangan 4,020 2,768 -31.1%
11 Bagh Mahanand Lar 739 510 -31.0%
12 Watlar Lar 3,476 2,469 -29.0%
13 Qasba Lar Lar 3,672 2,632 -28.3%
14 Hardu Mardabagh Ganderbal 134 97 -27.6%
15 Serch Chowdribagh Ganderbal 1,425 1,086 -23.8%
16 Yangoora Wakoora 6,380 5,000 -21.6%
17 Anderwan Lar 3,096 2,450 -20.9%
18 Najwan Nilla Kangan 1,193 1,000 -16.2%
19 Mamer Kangan 2,883 2,499 -13.3%
20 Cherwan Kangan 2,706 2,360 -12.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.