GaonData

Biggest population changes in Kishtwar district

Computed from 128 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Kishtwar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bhata Mughalmaidan 1,079 2,521 +133.6%
2 Shandri Drabshalla 288 616 +113.9%
3 Matti Padder 403 855 +112.2%
4 Anjole Thakraie 907 1,726 +90.3%
5 Sharoti Drabshalla 554 1,030 +85.9%
6 Joshana Drabshalla 266 472 +77.4%
7 Kukerwas Drabshalla 246 435 +76.8%
8 Bathkoot Drabshalla 1,192 2,100 +76.2%
9 Chamoti Drabshalla 1,444 2,500 +73.1%
10 Gadh Drabshalla 280 480 +71.4%
11 Teller Marwah 762 1,295 +70.0%
12 Nagbathna Drabshalla 266 441 +65.8%
13 Bhatan Nagseni 151 250 +65.6%
14 Ghan Drabshalla 995 1,621 +62.9%
15 Agral Trigam 1,040 1,680 +61.5%
16 Pora Drabshalla 497 800 +61.0%
17 Horna Mughalmaidan 1,514 2,360 +55.9%
18 Ligri Padder 1,824 2,780 +52.4%
19 Dichhad Inderwal 329 496 +50.8%
20 Dhar Drabshalla 415 619 +49.2%

Villages that shrank most in Kishtwar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gulabgarh Padder 1,195 740 -38.1%
2 Galhar Bhata Nagseni 1,644 1,065 -35.2%
3 Keshwan Thakraie 3,709 2,450 -33.9%
4 Mulchiter Mughalmaidan 3,121 2,090 -33.0%
5 Dichla Nagseni 734 500 -31.9%
6 Dimji Nagseni 360 250 -30.6%
7 Matta Kishtwar 3,114 2,190 -29.7%
8 Karool Drabshalla 4,145 3,020 -27.1%
9 Qaderna Marwah 1,961 1,457 -25.7%
10 Feller Thakraie 3,802 2,980 -21.6%
11 Patnazi Bunjwah 5,212 4,140 -20.6%
12 Haloor Drabshalla 578 506 -12.5%
13 Pethgam Marwah 1,242 1,142 -8.1%
14 Chasoti Padder 336 330 -1.8%
15 Mulwarwan Warwan 850 842 -0.9%
16 Basmina Warwan 1,041 1,034 -0.7%
17 Mungli Warwan 466 464 -0.4%
18 Hamori Padder 261 260 -0.4%
19 Choidraman Warwan 920 918 -0.2%
20 Brayan Warwan 761 760 -0.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.