GaonData

Biggest population changes in Kulgam district

Computed from 169 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Kulgam district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Hangal Buch Behibag 688 1,620 +135.5%
2 Nillow Pombay 2,619 6,000 +129.1%
3 Pambi Pombay 1,191 2,600 +118.3%
4 Gassi Rana Pahloo 772 1,662 +115.3%
5 Agroo Devsar 1,105 2,375 +114.9%
6 Jadi Pora Jagir Kulgam 408 875 +114.5%
7 Kanchloo Kund 1,521 3,250 +113.7%
8 Kakran Pombay 622 1,300 +109.0%
9 Palnoo Pandit Pora Behibag 426 780 +83.1%
10 Chogal Pora Manzgam 1,500 2,710 +80.7%
11 Chandergee Pahloo 803 1,390 +73.1%
12 Pach Gam Kund 1,009 1,725 +71.0%
13 Adijan Devsar Pombay 1,582 2,700 +70.7%
14 Munad Behibag 2,484 4,200 +69.1%
15 Nehama Pombay 1,254 2,119 +69.0%
16 Brazloo Jagir Frisal 1,456 2,429 +66.8%
17 Oriel Kund 1,671 2,706 +61.9%
18 Khokherhama Pombay 494 800 +61.9%
19 Hakra Dan Kund 253 400 +58.1%
20 Ringath D K Marg 1,038 1,630 +57.0%

Villages that shrank most in Kulgam district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Qasba Khul D.H. Pora 4,879 3,001 -38.5%
2 Tang Marg Manzgam 4,010 2,560 -36.2%
3 Boh D K Marg 3,902 2,500 -35.9%
4 Nawa Devsar 840 560 -33.3%
5 Katrasoo Kulgam 2,237 1,510 -32.5%
6 Danew Qaimoh 1,543 1,095 -29.0%
7 Hanjan Behibag 780 570 -26.9%
8 Khrewan Chadder Qaimoh 2,733 2,066 -24.4%
9 Chitri Pora Pahloo 738 559 -24.3%
10 Manzgam Manzgam 5,238 4,000 -23.6%
11 Nandimarg D.H. Pora 5,066 3,900 -23.0%
12 Chinagam Frisal 859 663 -22.8%
13 Yarhole Babapora Devsar 1,919 1,553 -19.1%
14 Thathoo Kund 306 250 -18.3%
15 Bata Pora Vailoo Pahloo 152 125 -17.8%
16 Kut Brari Behibag 131 108 -17.6%
17 Samnoo Pombay 1,278 1,086 -15.0%
18 Bugam Kulgam 3,849 3,300 -14.3%
19 Gadi Hama Pombay 537 462 -14.0%
20 Matipora Zaban Kulgam 366 323 -11.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 1 excluded in total. How the limits are set.