Biggest population changes in Kupwara district
Computed from 269 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kupwara district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zafarkhani | 613 | 1,523 | +148.4% |
| 2 | Muqam Lolab | 906 | 2,200 | +142.8% |
| 3 | Wajhama | 792 | 1,905 | +140.5% |
| 4 | Mawar | 1,135 | 2,698 | +137.7% |
| 5 | Bumhama | 3,081 | 7,200 | +133.7% |
| 6 | Daramwari | 522 | 1,200 | +129.9% |
| 7 | Dogripora | 1,341 | 3,005 | +124.1% |
| 8 | Rednagh | 1,592 | 3,402 | +113.7% |
| 9 | Banday | 956 | 2,000 | +109.2% |
| 10 | Lachi Pora | 689 | 1,418 | +105.8% |
| 11 | Hydermari | 157 | 315 | +100.6% |
| 12 | Dringla | 918 | 1,835 | +99.9% |
| 13 | Khai Pora | 1,338 | 2,501 | +86.9% |
| 14 | Kadhama | 313 | 585 | +86.9% |
| 15 | Kari Hama | 1,612 | 3,000 | +86.1% |
| 16 | Hayat Pora | 1,505 | 2,765 | +83.7% |
| 17 | Tutigund | 438 | 800 | +82.7% |
| 18 | Chani Pora Bala | 627 | 1,139 | +81.7% |
| 19 | Bober Nagh | 498 | 900 | +80.7% |
| 20 | Sochal Yari | 463 | 830 | +79.3% |
Villages that shrank most in Kupwara district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dahama | 3,238 | 1,998 | -38.3% |
| 2 | Warsun | 6,220 | 3,839 | -38.3% |
| 3 | Siver Thandipora | 5,524 | 3,421 | -38.1% |
| 4 | Maidan Chogul | 4,542 | 2,815 | -38.0% |
| 5 | Khawerpara | 3,124 | 1,937 | -38.0% |
| 6 | Diver Anderbugh | 10,863 | 6,800 | -37.4% |
| 7 | Lone Hari | 3,963 | 2,500 | -36.9% |
| 8 | Potushai | 3,333 | 2,150 | -35.5% |
| 9 | Dard Hari Khar Gund | 3,532 | 2,280 | -35.5% |
| 10 | Kandi | 3,713 | 2,400 | -35.4% |
| 11 | Bundnamble | 3,093 | 2,005 | -35.2% |
| 12 | Gugloosa | 3,975 | 2,593 | -34.8% |
| 13 | Dildar | 3,832 | 2,500 | -34.8% |
| 14 | Gagal | 5,555 | 3,630 | -34.6% |
| 15 | Chandigam | 3,482 | 2,280 | -34.5% |
| 16 | Kachama | 5,187 | 3,400 | -34.5% |
| 17 | Rudbugh | 2,657 | 1,755 | -34.0% |
| 18 | Rashan Pora | 3,758 | 2,500 | -33.5% |
| 19 | Hafrada | 3,913 | 2,618 | -33.1% |
| 20 | Farkin | 5,331 | 3,578 | -32.9% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.