Biggest population changes in Poonch district
Computed from 121 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Poonch district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaranwali Gali | 872 | 2,066 | +136.9% |
| 2 | Degwar Terwan | 1,104 | 2,540 | +130.1% |
| 3 | Nakarkote | 244 | 559 | +129.1% |
| 4 | Dara Bagyal | 1,579 | 3,520 | +122.9% |
| 5 | Dallan | 1,341 | 2,959 | +120.7% |
| 6 | Dharamsal Khari | 1,408 | 2,800 | +98.9% |
| 7 | Ajote | 1,803 | 3,573 | +98.2% |
| 8 | Traranwali | 2,713 | 5,250 | +93.5% |
| 9 | Topa | 1,742 | 3,323 | +90.8% |
| 10 | Dana Dhakran | 875 | 1,608 | +83.8% |
| 11 | Chanansar | 582 | 1,000 | +71.8% |
| 12 | Kankote | 756 | 1,297 | +71.6% |
| 13 | Surhoti | 1,937 | 3,300 | +70.4% |
| 14 | Gulpur | 1,738 | 2,937 | +69.0% |
| 15 | Brachar | 1,266 | 2,112 | +66.8% |
| 16 | Harni | 1,192 | 1,900 | +59.4% |
| 17 | Azamabad | 2,694 | 4,245 | +57.6% |
| 18 | Degwar Maldiyalan | 2,916 | 4,546 | +55.9% |
| 19 | Dunugam | 1,539 | 2,350 | +52.7% |
| 20 | Dhundak | 1,820 | 2,740 | +50.5% |
Villages that shrank most in Poonch district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mangnar | 3,664 | 2,260 | -38.3% |
| 2 | Dharana | 4,133 | 2,552 | -38.3% |
| 3 | Chungan | 4,509 | 2,829 | -37.3% |
| 4 | Dara Dullian | 6,773 | 4,282 | -36.8% |
| 5 | Mankote | 4,866 | 3,081 | -36.7% |
| 6 | Seri Chowana | 2,978 | 1,901 | -36.2% |
| 7 | Shahpur | 3,340 | 2,146 | -35.8% |
| 8 | Sangiote | 3,984 | 2,577 | -35.3% |
| 9 | Seri Khawaja | 3,557 | 2,330 | -34.5% |
| 10 | Uchhad | 3,585 | 2,350 | -34.5% |
| 11 | Chandimarh | 3,870 | 2,623 | -32.2% |
| 12 | Lassana | 4,250 | 2,895 | -31.9% |
| 13 | Mohra Bachai | 4,606 | 3,248 | -29.5% |
| 14 | Surankote | 4,284 | 3,065 | -28.4% |
| 15 | Kallar Kattal | 3,683 | 2,668 | -27.6% |
| 16 | Gunthal | 4,091 | 3,010 | -26.4% |
| 17 | Shiendara | 3,758 | 2,794 | -25.6% |
| 18 | Mahra | 3,290 | 2,446 | -25.6% |
| 19 | Hari Budha | 3,489 | 2,600 | -25.5% |
| 20 | Chandak | 3,207 | 2,442 | -23.9% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.