GaonData

Biggest population changes in Pulwama district

Computed from 177 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Pulwama district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Baghi Pampore 141 350 +148.2%
2 Nowpora Nowgam Newa 607 1,487 +145.0%
3 Krunchoo Pampore 783 1,875 +139.5%
4 Kawni Awantipora 419 900 +114.8%
5 Sherabad Tral 1,179 2,499 +112.0%
6 Bagh Sanger Wani Ichegoza 1,182 2,500 +111.5%
7 Bargam Dadsara 849 1,785 +110.3%
8 Naman Kakapora 811 1,685 +107.8%
9 Pad Gam Pora Awantipora 1,420 2,935 +106.7%
10 Jawahir Pora Aripal 1,307 2,692 +106.0%
11 Aglar Kandi Ichegoza 1,248 2,566 +105.6%
12 Nowdal Dadsara 1,083 2,213 +104.3%
13 Khalisa Parigam Newa 1,715 3,371 +96.6%
14 Gundi Pora Kakapora 1,098 1,848 +68.3%
15 Pingal Gam Kakapora 593 998 +68.3%
16 Chana Pora Shadimarg 330 555 +68.2%
17 Tumchi Nowpora Newa 499 800 +60.3%
18 Meej Pampore 1,759 2,803 +59.4%
19 Amirabad Dadsara 2,401 3,819 +59.1%
20 Konibal Pampore 2,486 3,920 +57.7%

Villages that shrank most in Pulwama district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Achgozz Bamnoo Ichegoza 4,022 2,510 -37.6%
2 Ratni Pora Kakapora 5,260 3,383 -35.7%
3 Drabgam Shadimarg 5,387 3,483 -35.3%
4 Pari Gam Newa 4,530 2,958 -34.7%
5 Gaber Pora Shadimarg 725 490 -32.4%
6 Chersoo Awantipora 5,046 3,500 -30.6%
7 DangerporaSpn Shadimarg 762 530 -30.4%
8 Sheikhhar Pulwama 437 306 -30.0%
9 Gudbugh Litter 163 115 -29.4%
10 Ari Hal Litter 4,815 3,586 -25.5%
11 Mandina Kakapora 1,029 812 -21.1%
12 Chewa Khurud Newa 873 700 -19.8%
13 Wakher Wan Pulwama 893 725 -18.8%
14 Haji Darpora Litter 285 244 -14.4%
15 Trichal Pulwama 2,915 2,500 -14.2%
16 Urwan Newa 1,556 1,350 -13.2%
17 Ugar Gund Newa 508 445 -12.4%
18 Nowpora Payeen Litter 980 875 -10.7%
19 Karimabad Newa 3,565 3,205 -10.1%
20 Baba Har Pulwama 1,549 1,410 -9.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 1 excluded in total. How the limits are set.