GaonData

Biggest population changes in Reasi district

Computed from 182 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Reasi district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Paroh Panthal 662 1,641 +147.9%
2 Neosi Chassana 1,014 2,500 +146.6%
3 Khadah Pouni 103 250 +142.7%
4 Nandkote Chassana 804 1,832 +127.9%
5 Arnas Arnas 653 1,487 +127.7%
6 Shadole Gulab Garh 1,275 2,798 +119.5%
7 Shikari Mahore 3,175 6,900 +117.3%
8 Maman Kote Chassana 1,019 2,209 +116.8%
9 Kunkanyalan Panthal 1,283 2,698 +110.3%
10 Chakal Hawallan Jig Bagli 1,011 2,078 +105.5%
11 Kans Brahamana Pouni 254 520 +104.7%
12 Badar Mahore 2,253 4,563 +102.5%
13 Dandakote Chassana 803 1,600 +99.3%
14 Gungus Pouni 199 395 +98.5%
15 Panthal Panthal 1,415 2,698 +90.7%
16 Jerdi Pouni 296 563 +90.2%
17 Dharote Arnas 282 534 +89.4%
18 Dugga Arnas 1,021 1,900 +86.1%
19 Bidda Arnas 910 1,646 +80.9%
20 Sarsote Chassana 1,028 1,832 +78.2%

Villages that shrank most in Reasi district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Butan Katra 791 490 -38.0%
2 Taleen Panthal 184 117 -36.4%
3 Dewal Gulab Garh 3,860 2,600 -32.6%
4 Laiter Pouni 2,327 1,700 -26.9%
5 Mansoo Reasi 871 650 -25.4%
6 Kotli Manotrian Reasi 2,937 2,258 -23.1%
7 Chana Chassana 4,884 4,000 -18.1%
8 Kanthi Arnas 3,947 3,600 -8.8%
9 Dadura Panthal 942 865 -8.2%
10 Jeri Pouni 359 330 -8.1%
11 Pandhal Pouni 223 210 -5.8%
12 Kanthan Arnas 2,416 2,300 -4.8%
13 Jadd Pouni 652 653 +0.1%
14 Ghai Jagir Pouni 212 215 +1.4%
15 Kolsar Pouni 582 600 +3.1%
16 Dadwa Pouni 1,097 1,135 +3.5%
17 Tote Bamagh 713 740 +3.8%
18 Tulli Chassana 8,016 8,400 +4.8%
19 Bakal Bamagh 490 515 +5.1%
20 Kalah Pouni 350 370 +5.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 2 excluded in total. How the limits are set.