Biggest population changes in Jharkhand
Computed from 21,608 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Jharkhand
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dhobghat | 321 | 800 | +149.2% |
| 2 | Chhotki Khajuria | 244 | 608 | +149.2% |
| 3 | Machatanr | 1,076 | 2,680 | +149.1% |
| 4 | Anabiri | 1,061 | 2,641 | +148.9% |
| 5 | Batat Kalan | 475 | 1,182 | +148.8% |
| 6 | Badalgora | 465 | 1,155 | +148.4% |
| 7 | Kumharpitni | 423 | 1,050 | +148.2% |
| 8 | Chitarsen Bahira | 113 | 280 | +147.8% |
| 9 | Kataiya | 170 | 421 | +147.7% |
| 10 | Rangamatiya | 168 | 416 | +147.6% |
| 11 | Lukumba Alias Lukumbar | 244 | 604 | +147.5% |
| 12 | Saharpur | 202 | 500 | +147.5% |
| 13 | Dughara | 283 | 700 | +147.3% |
| 14 | Kayrabani | 235 | 581 | +147.2% |
| 15 | Bihajori | 161 | 398 | +147.2% |
| 16 | Gokula. | 318 | 786 | +147.2% |
| 17 | Salukchapra | 2,265 | 5,598 | +147.2% |
| 18 | Ulti | 505 | 1,247 | +146.9% |
| 19 | Kudra | 298 | 735 | +146.6% |
| 20 | Surjugadi | 811 | 2,000 | +146.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Jharkhand
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Motipahari Bara | 2,644 | 1,600 | -39.5% |
| 2 | Parwaria Uttarwari | 937 | 567 | -39.5% |
| 3 | Chetna | 809 | 490 | -39.4% |
| 4 | Saraiyahat | 1,459 | 884 | -39.4% |
| 5 | Budalong | 1,447 | 877 | -39.4% |
| 6 | Barwadih. | 1,392 | 844 | -39.4% |
| 7 | Tarai | 1,288 | 781 | -39.4% |
| 8 | Jobo | 1,236 | 750 | -39.3% |
| 9 | Bhim Chak | 229 | 139 | -39.3% |
| 10 | Bhagwanpur | 329 | 200 | -39.2% |
| 11 | Raghunathpur | 342 | 208 | -39.2% |
| 12 | Bhuyanachna | 805 | 490 | -39.1% |
| 13 | Jagatdih | 253 | 154 | -39.1% |
| 14 | Dubhi | 1,723 | 1,050 | -39.1% |
| 15 | Bihari | 1,816 | 1,107 | -39.0% |
| 16 | Gurdi | 1,796 | 1,096 | -39.0% |
| 17 | Jhuri | 1,229 | 750 | -39.0% |
| 18 | Kusumha | 390 | 238 | -39.0% |
| 19 | Nayadih | 498 | 304 | -39.0% |
| 20 | Bhandaridih | 982 | 600 | -38.9% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1,473 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 27 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1,500 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.