GaonData

Biggest population changes in Deoghar district

Computed from 1,686 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Deoghar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Saharpur Sarwan 202 500 +147.5%
2 Goslidih Devipur 481 1,166 +142.4%
3 Nawadih Devipur 248 600 +141.9%
4 Pathar Madhupur 414 1,000 +141.6%
5 Kherwatari Devipur 497 1,200 +141.4%
6 BARANAWADA Madhupur 435 1,050 +141.4%
7 Kapsa. Devipur 212 510 +140.6%
8 Haripur Sarath 460 1,100 +139.1%
9 Baratikar Mohanpur 419 1,000 +138.7%
10 Bela Deoghar 255 605 +137.3%
11 Sundar Kanali Sarath 106 251 +136.8%
12 Daulatpur Deoghar 281 650 +131.3%
13 Ghurniya Malniya Sarwan 435 1,000 +129.9%
14 Nawadih Hajari Sarath 246 563 +128.9%
15 Kusmaha Sarath 225 512 +127.6%
16 Khaspalak Mohanpur 562 1,278 +127.4%
17 Uparbahinga Mohanpur 377 850 +125.5%
18 Morhabari Sarath 142 320 +125.3%
19 Kolgi Palojori 889 2,000 +125.0%
20 Pahridih Chhit Deoghar 361 811 +124.7%

Villages that shrank most in Deoghar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Jhuri Devipur 1,229 750 -39.0%
2 Basmata Palojori 273 167 -38.8%
3 Dangri Mohanpur 375 230 -38.7%
4 Khejuriya Chhit Deoghar 326 200 -38.6%
5 GONDLITANR Madhupur 1,677 1,031 -38.5%
6 Panchudih Chhit Sarwan 709 436 -38.5%
7 Saharpura Devipur 304 189 -37.8%
8 Belbarana Sarath 993 620 -37.6%
9 Nand Kura Palojori 467 294 -37.0%
10 Upar Jamuni Sarwan 364 230 -36.8%
11 Murgabani Sarath 435 275 -36.8%
12 Nawadih Madhupur 526 333 -36.7%
13 Kolhar Karown 945 600 -36.5%
14 Tarajora Sarwan 834 530 -36.5%
15 Basmandih Deoghar 236 150 -36.4%
16 Jitjori Devipur 1,579 1,005 -36.4%
17 Uparthari Sarwan 714 455 -36.3%
18 Bhalpahri Devipur 247 158 -36.0%
19 Nawadih Chak Domahani Sarath 880 563 -36.0%
20 Duba Sarwan 652 421 -35.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 203 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 205 excluded in total. How the limits are set.