GaonData

Biggest population changes in Gumla district

Computed from 796 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Gumla district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Anabiri Dumri 1,061 2,641 +148.9%
2 Balatu Bishunpur 303 729 +140.6%
3 Basua Gumla 3,780 9,048 +139.4%
4 Dodang Ghaghra 667 1,562 +134.2%
5 Tetardih Raidih 178 408 +129.2%
6 Pilkhi Sisai 876 2,002 +128.5%
7 Longa Bishunpur 500 1,139 +127.8%
8 Rengnitoli Albert Ekka 267 588 +120.2%
9 Lalpur Ghaghra 323 690 +113.6%
10 Dipadih Chainpur 409 840 +105.4%
11 Bhandariya Gumla 1,174 2,400 +104.4%
12 Ekamba Sisai 436 884 +102.8%
13 Barkoili Kamdara 596 1,204 +102.0%
14 Chhotkisamdari Bishunpur 159 321 +101.9%
15 Kharka Bharno 750 1,500 +100.0%
16 Kanchora Raidih 764 1,520 +99.0%
17 Togo Albert Ekka 135 268 +98.5%
18 Latdag Sisai 1,139 2,239 +96.6%
19 Mael Ghaghra 673 1,322 +96.4%
20 Saraidih Ghaghra 274 538 +96.3%

Villages that shrank most in Gumla district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Dhodhra Gumla 1,178 722 -38.7%
2 Gamhariya Sisai 798 490 -38.6%
3 Bamalkera Raidih 1,264 780 -38.3%
4 Sirkot Ghaghra 590 370 -37.3%
5 Barwadih Albert Ekka 788 496 -37.1%
6 Tigra Albert Ekka 1,242 785 -36.8%
7 Kulburu Kamdara 1,461 924 -36.8%
8 Khukhradih Ghaghra 500 320 -36.0%
9 Kocha Sisai 1,092 716 -34.4%
10 Deogaon Palkot 1,114 735 -34.0%
11 Jamgain Raidih 1,127 745 -33.9%
12 Narma Bishunpur 3,131 2,075 -33.7%
13 Sursang Raidih 2,365 1,569 -33.7%
14 Narsinghpur Kamdara 1,025 680 -33.7%
15 Ramjari Basia 1,265 849 -32.9%
16 Chatam Bishunpur 739 500 -32.3%
17 Jarda Albert Ekka 1,075 734 -31.7%
18 Sidma Basia 502 347 -30.9%
19 Patgachha Gumla 1,001 693 -30.8%
20 Dari Sisai 882 612 -30.6%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 5 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 6 excluded in total. How the limits are set.