GaonData

Biggest population changes in Koderma district

Computed from 446 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Koderma district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Naitand Domchanch 218 530 +143.1%
2 Daldalia Jainagar 482 1,120 +132.4%
3 Khagradih Jainagar 550 1,264 +129.8%
4 Pathalgadda Chandwara 1,662 3,603 +116.8%
5 Danti Satgawan 260 560 +115.4%
6 Devipur Markacho 1,881 3,980 +111.6%
7 debwa Markacho 475 1,005 +111.6%
8 Badulia Jainagar 993 2,100 +111.5%
9 Maheshpur Domchanch 774 1,600 +106.7%
10 Kanti Chandwara 4,601 9,363 +103.5%
11 Chondhi Domchanch 152 300 +97.4%
12 Kisunpur Domchanch 107 210 +96.3%
13 Doiadih Koderma 865 1,682 +94.5%
14 Bajpur Chandwara 233 450 +93.1%
15 Bichariya Markacho 841 1,614 +91.9%
16 Pahar Singh Khaira Satgawan 421 802 +90.5%
17 Sahebadih Jainagar 132 251 +90.2%
18 Kharpoka Jainagar 1,011 1,912 +89.1%
19 Yogidih Chandwara 758 1,406 +85.5%
20 Sugasankh Jainagar 703 1,300 +84.9%

Villages that shrank most in Koderma district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Charkipahri Chandwara 1,112 680 -38.9%
2 Joungi Chandwara 1,369 850 -37.9%
3 Harli Chandwara 879 577 -34.4%
4 Bara Chandwara 962 635 -34.0%
5 Denibad Markacho 258 175 -32.2%
6 Matauni Jainagar 1,252 854 -31.8%
7 ChamgudoKhurd Chandwara 1,039 713 -31.4%
8 yogidih Markacho 431 296 -31.3%
9 lohabar Markacho 126 87 -30.9%
10 Harino Chandwara 1,415 991 -30.0%
11 Lokai Koderma 1,787 1,279 -28.4%
12 Manjhladih Markacho 402 301 -25.1%
13 Jamkati Chandwara 397 300 -24.4%
14 Panchmoh Satgawan 920 710 -22.8%
15 Jhumri Koderma 3,855 3,000 -22.2%
16 Murtia Chandwara 465 363 -21.9%
17 Medwapahari Markacho 121 96 -20.7%
18 Karmandih Domchanch 736 594 -19.3%
19 Kataiya Satgawan 1,682 1,362 -19.0%
20 Dumardiha Markacho 1,435 1,163 -18.9%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 31 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 31 excluded in total. How the limits are set.