GaonData

Biggest population changes in Latehar district

Computed from 545 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Latehar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Batat Kalan Latehar 475 1,182 +148.8%
2 Kudra Chandwa 298 735 +146.6%
3 Alagdiha Latehar 135 320 +137.0%
4 Nawadih Latehar 231 528 +128.6%
5 Baresanr Garu 1,303 2,950 +126.4%
6 Jalima Manika 291 648 +122.7%
7 Ichak Latehar 1,364 3,000 +119.9%
8 Hendehas Garu 299 651 +117.7%
9 Khairajagir Latehar 293 634 +116.4%
10 Dhobia Tharan Latehar 218 455 +108.7%
11 Hosir Latehar 604 1,260 +108.6%
12 Siris Manika 439 915 +108.4%
13 Sewan Manika 432 900 +108.3%
14 Harkha Latehar 347 711 +104.9%
15 Nawadih Latehar 471 960 +103.8%
16 Bhang Balumath 351 710 +102.3%
17 Barahi Mahuadanr 863 1,700 +97.0%
18 Batat Khurd Latehar 457 895 +95.8%
19 Barwadih Bariyatu 349 680 +94.8%
20 Kura Latehar 876 1,700 +94.1%

Villages that shrank most in Latehar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Ambatikar Manika 189 120 -36.5%
2 Sabano Latehar 1,576 1,020 -35.3%
3 Lali Manika 1,947 1,269 -34.8%
4 Bariatu Bariyatu 3,059 2,000 -34.6%
5 Khajurtola Mahuadanr 612 410 -33.0%
6 Tasatwar Balumath 297 200 -32.7%
7 Nawada Herhanj 1,347 930 -31.0%
8 Manika Manika 4,165 2,885 -30.7%
9 Janta Mahuadanr 222 156 -29.7%
10 Shahpur Mahuadanr 797 566 -29.0%
11 Ejamar Manika 517 368 -28.8%
12 Katang Herhanj 671 480 -28.5%
13 Chainpur Mahuadanr 1,156 830 -28.2%
14 Lakhepur Mahuadanr 282 205 -27.3%
15 Ladhup Chandwa 1,070 782 -26.9%
16 Mirgi Mahuadanr 759 555 -26.9%
17 Kutudiri Mahuadanr 347 260 -25.1%
18 Tola Hurdag Alias Chirodih Garu 239 180 -24.7%
19 Tata Chandwa 126 95 -24.6%
20 Banhardi Chandwa 2,051 1,556 -24.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 18 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 19 excluded in total. How the limits are set.