GaonData

Biggest population changes in Ramgarh district

Computed from 225 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Ramgarh district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Nawasirka Gola 275 623 +126.5%
2 Jumra Patratu 645 1,385 +114.7%
3 Sondiha Mandu 3,323 6,815 +105.1%
4 Koto Patratu 1,216 2,470 +103.1%
5 Terpa Patratu 1,593 3,215 +101.8%
6 Gobindpur Mandu 1,155 2,330 +101.7%
7 Lipya Gola 2,118 4,200 +98.3%
8 Datma Mandu 786 1,550 +97.2%
9 Kekobasaudi Mandu 179 350 +95.5%
10 Oriyatu Patratu 201 354 +76.1%
11 Gaurabera Chitarpur 125 215 +72.0%
12 Burhakhap Mandu 430 735 +70.9%
13 Sanki Patratu 1,258 2,150 +70.9%
14 Chhotki Shidhwar Patratu 280 465 +66.1%
15 Chetma Patratu 139 230 +65.5%
16 Palu Patratu 2,547 4,171 +63.8%
17 Nimmi Patratu 977 1,586 +62.3%
18 Bhalu Dulmi 1,319 2,089 +58.4%
19 Lodhma Ramgarh 1,509 2,317 +53.5%
20 Chhotki Lari Chitarpur 1,957 3,000 +53.3%

Villages that shrank most in Ramgarh district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Jobo Patratu 1,236 750 -39.3%
2 Bhadwa Mandu 3,211 2,245 -30.1%
3 Piri Patratu 2,195 1,538 -29.9%
4 Laiyo Mandu 7,730 5,567 -28.0%
5 Osam Patratu 321 240 -25.2%
6 Kamta Gola 2,141 1,622 -24.2%
7 Chordhara Patratu 3,746 2,870 -23.4%
8 Sirka Mandu 2,165 1,753 -19.0%
9 Armadag Patratu 755 629 -16.7%
10 Chito Patratu 891 770 -13.6%
11 Sarubera Mandu 2,304 2,000 -13.2%
12 Barkisarla Gola 1,640 1,447 -11.8%
13 Parej Mandu 1,952 1,750 -10.3%
14 Tokisud Patratu 997 900 -9.7%
15 Salgo Patratu 701 640 -8.7%
16 Bicha Patratu 1,936 1,800 -7.0%
17 Bisa Gola 592 560 -5.4%
18 Bhaypur Dulmi 643 612 -4.8%
19 Ladi Patratu 1,627 1,568 -3.6%
20 Gargali Mandu 1,552 1,500 -3.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 4 excluded in total. How the limits are set.