GaonData

Biggest population changes in Saraikela Kharsawan district

Computed from 854 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Saraikela Kharsawan district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Barhai Rajnagar 241 594 +146.5%
2 Musribera Chandil 889 2,160 +143.0%
3 Dubrajpur Rajnagar 305 692 +126.9%
4 Shikli Chandil 471 1,052 +123.3%
5 Mahali Murup Seraikella 562 1,242 +121.0%
6 Saurang Kharsawan 103 225 +118.5%
7 Jharidih Nimdih 221 475 +114.9%
8 Paharpur Seraikella 559 1,200 +114.7%
9 Nichintpur Rajnagar 273 572 +109.5%
10 Uparbera Gamharia 614 1,253 +104.1%
11 Lengdih Chandil 449 900 +100.5%
12 Naranpur Kharsawan 293 570 +94.5%
13 Ruchap Chandil 4,147 8,005 +93.0%
14 Buriguta Kharsawan 362 694 +91.7%
15 Amla Tala Rajnagar 488 932 +91.0%
16 Dhatkidih Gamharia 626 1,195 +90.9%
17 Samudih Kuchai 193 364 +88.6%
18 Ramgarh Chandil 752 1,410 +87.5%
19 Karko Rajnagar 341 638 +87.1%
20 Sarjamdih Rajnagar 123 230 +87.0%

Villages that shrank most in Saraikela Kharsawan district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Budalong Ichagarh 1,447 877 -39.4%
2 Bhuyanachna Rajnagar 805 490 -39.1%
3 Dhatkidih Seraikella 376 230 -38.8%
4 Dhadkidih Gamharia 1,089 671 -38.4%
5 Padampur Seraikella 444 277 -37.6%
6 Palobera Seraikella 287 182 -36.6%
7 Baridih Rajnagar 272 175 -35.7%
8 Chutiakhal Chandil 421 271 -35.6%
9 Tirildih Kukru 1,566 1,014 -35.3%
10 Mahuldiha Rajnagar 230 150 -34.8%
11 Rawtara Chandil 1,348 880 -34.7%
12 Burudih Rajnagar 418 275 -34.2%
13 Gopalpur Seraikella 314 211 -32.8%
14 Chaliama Rajnagar 754 510 -32.4%
15 Bandhdih Nimdih 851 578 -32.1%
16 Juritand Seraikella 129 90 -30.2%
17 Chokay Rajnagar 505 354 -29.9%
18 Kalyanpur Nimdih 1,351 959 -29.0%
19 Edal Rajnagar 1,681 1,200 -28.6%
20 Tulgram Chandil 966 725 -24.9%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 30 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 30 excluded in total. How the limits are set.