GaonData

Biggest population changes in Simdega district

Computed from 377 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Simdega district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Barbera Jaldega 292 678 +132.2%
2 Kauwadarha Jaldega 108 249 +130.6%
3 Masekera Pakartanr 210 466 +121.9%
4 Khijurbahar Bano 237 521 +119.8%
5 Jhunka Chhapar Kurdeg 857 1,761 +105.5%
6 Keyondpani Kolebira 289 565 +95.5%
7 Karamukha Pakartanr 496 910 +83.5%
8 Sutriuli Bano 453 765 +68.9%
9 Banjoga Jaldega 894 1,495 +67.2%
10 Churiya Thethaitanger 739 1,211 +63.9%
11 Sikorda Bano 977 1,570 +60.7%
12 Mangaspur Jaldega 320 505 +57.8%
13 Barumda Bano 311 475 +52.7%
14 Lachragarh Kolebira 5,241 7,937 +51.4%
15 Rengapani Pakartanr 437 654 +49.7%
16 Ghutbahar Thethaitanger 4,427 6,570 +48.4%
17 Mayamdega Jaldega 514 760 +47.9%
18 Urte Bansjore 2,693 3,962 +47.1%
19 Sikrom Bano 226 330 +46.0%
20 Kinirkela Jaldega 431 624 +44.8%

Villages that shrank most in Simdega district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bindhantoli Simdega 511 315 -38.4%
2 Genmer Bano 1,563 1,052 -32.7%
3 Birkera Simdega 864 620 -28.2%
4 Machhkatta Bolba 570 410 -28.1%
5 Sarpmunda Kurdeg 891 648 -27.3%
6 Lamgarh Bano 633 465 -26.5%
7 Katukona Simdega 804 607 -24.5%
8 Dumardih Simdega 795 620 -22.0%
9 Takba Kolebira 627 493 -21.4%
10 Belkuba Bolba 1,211 956 -21.1%
11 Dumbariya Bano 2,608 2,088 -19.9%
12 Jamunakhar Simdega 849 680 -19.9%
13 Chhotkibiura Kurdeg 948 768 -19.0%
14 Sumuibera Bano 597 484 -18.9%
15 Hurpi Bano 657 533 -18.9%
16 Kanta Bano 306 250 -18.3%
17 Jamur Soiya Bano 606 496 -18.1%
18 Kombakera Kolebira 1,274 1,069 -16.1%
19 Pithra Simdega 3,992 3,370 -15.6%
20 Tabhadih Simdega 1,415 1,206 -14.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.