Biggest population changes in Dakshin Kannad district
Computed from 129 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Dakshin Kannad district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | G0Lithattu | 2,488 | 5,944 | +138.9% |
| 2 | Muthuru | 1,875 | 4,366 | +132.8% |
| 3 | Badagannur | 3,109 | 6,751 | +117.1% |
| 4 | Kanyady | 1,926 | 3,466 | +80.0% |
| 5 | Tankaulipady | 2,188 | 3,915 | +78.9% |
| 6 | Kalavar | 1,115 | 1,964 | +76.1% |
| 7 | Mogaru | 2,797 | 4,767 | +70.4% |
| 8 | Badagakajekar | 2,919 | 4,745 | +62.6% |
| 9 | Shirady | 2,933 | 4,508 | +53.7% |
| 10 | Nettanigemudnoor | 8,447 | 12,676 | +50.1% |
| 11 | Noojibalthila | 3,278 | 4,914 | +49.9% |
| 12 | Aryapu (Rural) | 5,980 | 8,948 | +49.6% |
| 13 | Manila | 3,120 | 4,580 | +46.8% |
| 14 | Idkidu | 3,776 | 5,367 | +42.1% |
| 15 | Sarapady | 3,602 | 5,070 | +40.8% |
| 16 | Surinje | 3,098 | 4,337 | +40.0% |
| 17 | Delanthabettu | 1,464 | 2,049 | +40.0% |
| 18 | Ujire | 13,429 | 18,652 | +38.9% |
| 19 | Kashipatna | 2,673 | 3,698 | +38.4% |
| 20 | Kunthoor | 2,541 | 3,486 | +37.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Dakshin Kannad district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thenkakaranduru | 2,345 | 1,994 | -15.0% |
| 2 | Netlamudnur | 4,010 | 3,502 | -12.7% |
| 3 | Kuriya | 3,279 | 2,982 | -9.1% |
| 4 | Biliyur | 3,612 | 3,472 | -3.9% |
| 5 | Renjilady | 1,692 | 1,636 | -3.3% |
| 6 | Irvathur | 1,981 | 1,927 | -2.7% |
| 7 | Navara | 912 | 896 | -1.8% |
| 8 | Panaje | 3,946 | 3,890 | -1.4% |
| 9 | Peradi | 1,506 | 1,485 | -1.4% |
| 10 | Kuthluru | 1,859 | 1,845 | -0.8% |
| 11 | Nellurkembraje | 2,848 | 2,845 | -0.1% |
| 12 | Sampaje | 5,429 | 5,431 | +0.0% |
| 13 | Devachalla | 3,820 | 3,825 | +0.1% |
| 14 | Guthigaru | 4,211 | 4,220 | +0.2% |
| 15 | Jalsoor | 6,623 | 6,642 | +0.3% |
| 16 | Badagumijaru | 3,430 | 3,450 | +0.6% |
| 17 | Tenkamijar | 5,050 | 5,080 | +0.6% |
| 18 | Barimar | 2,919 | 2,947 | +1.0% |
| 19 | Nyayatarpu | 1,915 | 1,936 | +1.1% |
| 20 | Savanur | 4,031 | 4,081 | +1.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.