GaonData

Biggest population changes in Uttar Kannad district

Computed from 628 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Uttar Kannad district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Wailwada Karwar 790 1,898 +140.3%
2 Shirkur Honavar 378 820 +116.9%
3 Hitlasara Yellapur 204 439 +115.2%
4 Konalli Kumta 1,029 2,207 +114.5%
5 Kankichitta Honavar 151 308 +104.0%
6 Hiregutti Kumta 3,076 6,253 +103.3%
7 Kodsar-Halkani Siddapur 177 347 +96.0%
8 Donshirgur Dandeli 117 225 +92.3%
9 Kuravante Siddapur 102 195 +91.2%
10 Kuchegar Karwar 155 275 +77.4%
11 Gubbagod Siddapur 511 900 +76.1%
12 Kadekodi Kumta 503 885 +75.9%
13 Shivapur Supa 185 325 +75.7%
14 Mallapur Karwar 2,192 3,828 +74.6%
15 Chandavar Honavar 4,069 7,071 +73.8%
16 Malamba Supa 311 537 +72.7%
17 Hankon Karwar 1,168 2,014 +72.4%
18 Mahime Honavar 2,685 4,375 +62.9%
19 Bhanasageri Haliyal 955 1,540 +61.3%
20 Kudrige Honavar 2,987 4,812 +61.1%

Villages that shrank most in Uttar Kannad district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Mavalli Bhatkal 17,062 10,439 -38.8%
2 Kawalwad Haliyal 3,195 1,960 -38.6%
3 Ajga0N Haliyal 412 275 -33.3%
4 Virje Karwar 7,058 4,809 -31.9%
5 Somanalli Sirsi 120 88 -26.7%
6 Keremane Siddapur 551 405 -26.5%
7 Bislakoppa Sirsi 515 408 -20.8%
8 Katar Karwar 667 529 -20.7%
9 Balgar Sirsi 142 113 -20.4%
10 Heggar Honavar 191 153 -19.9%
11 Kodigadde Siddapur 372 301 -19.1%
12 Mutta Honavar 1,124 914 -18.7%
13 Kariyadi Supa 156 128 -17.9%
14 Payaswadi Supa 560 460 -17.9%
15 Kaiga Karwar 238 197 -17.2%
16 Chapoli (Kalsai) Supa 838 694 -17.2%
17 Kolimanjaguni Kumta 289 240 -17.0%
18 Nilkod Kumta 112 95 -15.2%
19 Hukali (Wajgod) Siddapur 201 171 -14.9%
20 Gobral Dandeli 152 130 -14.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 69 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 69 excluded in total. How the limits are set.