Biggest population changes in Vijayapura district
Computed from 504 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Vijayapura district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hadaginal | 308 | 750 | +143.5% |
| 2 | Ramanahalli | 1,615 | 3,800 | +135.3% |
| 3 | Basaveshwar Nagar | 801 | 1,880 | +134.7% |
| 4 | Khainur | 2,563 | 6,000 | +134.1% |
| 5 | Dindawar | 3,285 | 7,650 | +132.9% |
| 6 | Nidoni | 6,648 | 15,480 | +132.8% |
| 7 | Bhankalgi | 946 | 2,200 | +132.6% |
| 8 | Kalkeri | 8,300 | 19,300 | +132.5% |
| 9 | Ganganahalli | 1,539 | 3,550 | +130.7% |
| 10 | Arjunagi | 2,255 | 5,200 | +130.6% |
| 11 | Hanchinal | 1,132 | 2,600 | +129.7% |
| 12 | Ingalgi | 1,809 | 4,100 | +126.6% |
| 13 | Yakkundi | 2,057 | 4,650 | +126.1% |
| 14 | Shivanagi | 6,553 | 14,720 | +124.6% |
| 15 | Jambagi(H) | 1,181 | 2,620 | +121.8% |
| 16 | Byakod | 2,358 | 5,124 | +117.3% |
| 17 | Mahaveernagar | 1,620 | 3,500 | +116.0% |
| 18 | Honaganahalli | 2,149 | 4,607 | +114.4% |
| 19 | Surgihalli | 3,040 | 6,500 | +113.8% |
| 20 | Bagalur | 2,858 | 6,000 | +109.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Vijayapura district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Umrani (Old) | 2,902 | 1,756 | -39.5% |
| 2 | Hadalasang | 2,996 | 1,825 | -39.1% |
| 3 | Bastihal | 1,142 | 700 | -38.7% |
| 4 | Uppala-Dinni | 2,896 | 1,829 | -36.8% |
| 5 | Kakhandaki | 7,038 | 4,500 | -36.1% |
| 6 | Animadu | 185 | 120 | -35.1% |
| 7 | Sonakanahalli | 1,914 | 1,253 | -34.5% |
| 8 | Nandihal (P.H.) | 686 | 458 | -33.2% |
| 9 | Hubanur | 2,980 | 2,038 | -31.6% |
| 10 | Matakal Devanhalli | 455 | 314 | -31.0% |
| 11 | Lalasangi | 2,951 | 2,145 | -27.3% |
| 12 | Shantinagar | 1,709 | 1,250 | -26.9% |
| 13 | Takali | 2,343 | 1,751 | -25.3% |
| 14 | Alaginal | 1,258 | 1,006 | -20.0% |
| 15 | Karur | 1,181 | 950 | -19.6% |
| 16 | Siddapura | 4,400 | 3,562 | -19.1% |
| 17 | Mamadapur | 4,814 | 3,960 | -17.7% |
| 18 | Uppaladinni | 807 | 665 | -17.6% |
| 19 | Devaranavadgi | 3,786 | 3,125 | -17.5% |
| 20 | Toravi (Part) | 5,682 | 4,703 | -17.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.