Biggest population changes in Alappuzha district
Computed from 23 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Alappuzha district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramankary | 10,755 | 13,332 | +24.0% |
| 2 | Thakazhy | 15,758 | 18,826 | +19.5% |
| 3 | Kainakary North | 8,292 | 9,805 | +18.3% |
| 4 | Pattanakkad | 31,629 | 34,620 | +9.5% |
| 5 | Chengannur (Part) | 1,989 | 2,039 | +2.5% |
| 6 | Kunnumma | 14,252 | 14,457 | +1.4% |
| 7 | Karuvatta | 14,755 | 14,819 | +0.4% |
| 8 | Perungala | 14,151 | 14,201 | +0.3% |
| 9 | Cheruthana | 12,882 | 12,854 | -0.2% |
| 10 | Thuravoor Thekku | 28,802 | 28,698 | -0.4% |
| 11 | Mulakuzha (Part) | 28,390 | 28,280 | -0.4% |
| 12 | Thiruvanvandoor | 12,712 | 12,662 | -0.4% |
| 13 | Thalavady | 20,556 | 20,459 | -0.5% |
| 14 | Pandanad (Part) | 11,489 | 11,417 | -0.6% |
| 15 | Veeyapuram | 11,392 | 11,320 | -0.6% |
| 16 | Kadakkarappally | 20,487 | 20,110 | -1.8% |
| 17 | Ala (Part) | 13,665 | 13,395 | -2.0% |
| 18 | Puliyoor(Part) | 16,531 | 15,377 | -7.0% |
| 19 | Edathua | 21,699 | 19,094 | -12.0% |
| 20 | Nedumudi | 14,601 | 12,319 | -15.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Alappuzha district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kavalam | 13,089 | 8,579 | -34.5% |
| 2 | Pallippad | 24,648 | 16,738 | -32.1% |
| 3 | Neelamperoor | 5,841 | 4,840 | -17.1% |
| 4 | Nedumudi | 14,601 | 12,319 | -15.6% |
| 5 | Edathua | 21,699 | 19,094 | -12.0% |
| 6 | Puliyoor(Part) | 16,531 | 15,377 | -7.0% |
| 7 | Ala (Part) | 13,665 | 13,395 | -2.0% |
| 8 | Kadakkarappally | 20,487 | 20,110 | -1.8% |
| 9 | Pandanad (Part) | 11,489 | 11,417 | -0.6% |
| 10 | Veeyapuram | 11,392 | 11,320 | -0.6% |
| 11 | Thalavady | 20,556 | 20,459 | -0.5% |
| 12 | Mulakuzha (Part) | 28,390 | 28,280 | -0.4% |
| 13 | Thiruvanvandoor | 12,712 | 12,662 | -0.4% |
| 14 | Thuravoor Thekku | 28,802 | 28,698 | -0.4% |
| 15 | Cheruthana | 12,882 | 12,854 | -0.2% |
| 16 | Perungala | 14,151 | 14,201 | +0.3% |
| 17 | Karuvatta | 14,755 | 14,819 | +0.4% |
| 18 | Kunnumma | 14,252 | 14,457 | +1.4% |
| 19 | Chengannur (Part) | 1,989 | 2,039 | +2.5% |
| 20 | Pattanakkad | 31,629 | 34,620 | +9.5% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.