Biggest population changes in Ernakulam district
Computed from 23 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Ernakulam district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kizhakkambalam | 23,186 | 33,363 | +43.9% |
| 2 | Rayamangalam | 27,537 | 36,722 | +33.4% |
| 3 | Ezhikkara | 10,813 | 11,840 | +9.5% |
| 4 | Muvattupuzha (Part) | 19,797 | 20,812 | +5.1% |
| 5 | Manjapra | 15,312 | 16,011 | +4.6% |
| 6 | Ayyampuzha | 14,253 | 14,902 | +4.5% |
| 7 | Mookkannoor | 19,009 | 19,628 | +3.3% |
| 8 | Keerampara | 12,258 | 12,525 | +2.2% |
| 9 | Memury | 10,049 | 10,265 | +2.1% |
| 10 | Kunnukara | 16,433 | 16,542 | +0.7% |
| 11 | Karukutty | 28,076 | 28,118 | +0.1% |
| 12 | Parakkadavu | 30,766 | 30,752 | -0.1% |
| 13 | Neriamangalam | 15,994 | 15,961 | -0.2% |
| 14 | Thiruvaniyoor | 25,327 | 25,171 | -0.6% |
| 15 | Varappetty | 18,867 | 18,688 | -0.9% |
| 16 | Kuttampuzha | 24,799 | 24,451 | -1.4% |
| 17 | Aikaranad North | 20,316 | 19,432 | -4.3% |
| 18 | Pindimana | 12,516 | 11,801 | -5.7% |
| 19 | Thuravoor | 22,786 | 21,468 | -5.8% |
| 20 | Ramamangalam | 10,035 | 9,229 | -8.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Ernakulam district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kottappady | 13,512 | 10,271 | -24.0% |
| 2 | Kuttamangalam | 17,400 | 13,766 | -20.9% |
| 3 | Marady (Part) | 17,176 | 15,543 | -9.5% |
| 4 | Ramamangalam | 10,035 | 9,229 | -8.0% |
| 5 | Thuravoor | 22,786 | 21,468 | -5.8% |
| 6 | Pindimana | 12,516 | 11,801 | -5.7% |
| 7 | Aikaranad North | 20,316 | 19,432 | -4.3% |
| 8 | Kuttampuzha | 24,799 | 24,451 | -1.4% |
| 9 | Varappetty | 18,867 | 18,688 | -0.9% |
| 10 | Thiruvaniyoor | 25,327 | 25,171 | -0.6% |
| 11 | Neriamangalam | 15,994 | 15,961 | -0.2% |
| 12 | Parakkadavu | 30,766 | 30,752 | -0.1% |
| 13 | Karukutty | 28,076 | 28,118 | +0.1% |
| 14 | Kunnukara | 16,433 | 16,542 | +0.7% |
| 15 | Memury | 10,049 | 10,265 | +2.1% |
| 16 | Keerampara | 12,258 | 12,525 | +2.2% |
| 17 | Mookkannoor | 19,009 | 19,628 | +3.3% |
| 18 | Ayyampuzha | 14,253 | 14,902 | +4.5% |
| 19 | Manjapra | 15,312 | 16,011 | +4.6% |
| 20 | Muvattupuzha (Part) | 19,797 | 20,812 | +5.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.