Biggest population changes in Idukki district
Computed from 36 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Idukki district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keezhanthoor | 4,205 | 6,758 | +60.7% |
| 2 | Upputhara | 18,885 | 26,236 | +38.9% |
| 3 | Baisonvally | 12,653 | 13,941 | +10.2% |
| 4 | Santhanpara | 6,782 | 7,104 | +4.8% |
| 5 | Poopara | 8,231 | 8,528 | +3.6% |
| 6 | Peruvanthanam | 14,093 | 14,497 | +2.9% |
| 7 | Arakkulam | 12,421 | 12,515 | +0.8% |
| 8 | Karimkunnam (Part) | 11,956 | 12,042 | +0.7% |
| 9 | Udumbannoor | 23,709 | 23,859 | +0.6% |
| 10 | Mannamkandam | 40,593 | 40,484 | -0.3% |
| 11 | Rajakumari | 16,253 | 16,086 | -1.0% |
| 12 | Vathikudy | 26,359 | 26,083 | -1.1% |
| 13 | Muttom | 11,037 | 10,909 | -1.2% |
| 14 | Udumbanchola | 10,064 | 9,838 | -2.3% |
| 15 | Kanthippara | 10,901 | 10,625 | -2.5% |
| 16 | Kokkayar | 12,190 | 11,786 | -3.3% |
| 17 | Kumaramangalam (Part) | 15,522 | 14,865 | -4.2% |
| 18 | Rajakkad | 16,486 | 15,198 | -7.8% |
| 19 | Kunjithanny | 12,202 | 11,192 | -8.3% |
| 20 | Idukki | 21,724 | 19,723 | -9.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Idukki district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kanthalloor | 6,758 | 4,205 | -37.8% |
| 2 | Thankamony | 24,389 | 16,784 | -31.2% |
| 3 | Upputhode | 8,755 | 6,187 | -29.3% |
| 4 | Periyar | 22,978 | 16,417 | -28.6% |
| 5 | Thodupuzha (Part) | 557 | 412 | -26.0% |
| 6 | Chakkupallam | 12,609 | 9,558 | -24.2% |
| 7 | Chathurangapara | 4,177 | 3,175 | -24.0% |
| 8 | Vagamon | 14,641 | 11,432 | -21.9% |
| 9 | Peerumade | 22,213 | 17,512 | -21.2% |
| 10 | Kudayathoor | 10,080 | 8,010 | -20.5% |
| 11 | Vannapuram | 28,905 | 24,217 | -16.2% |
| 12 | Velliyamattom | 19,366 | 16,718 | -13.7% |
| 13 | Karimannoor | 14,836 | 12,855 | -13.3% |
| 14 | Karunapuram | 30,473 | 26,637 | -12.6% |
| 15 | Parathodu | 20,417 | 18,422 | -9.8% |
| 16 | Neyyasseri | 7,557 | 6,820 | -9.8% |
| 17 | Idukki | 21,724 | 19,723 | -9.2% |
| 18 | Kunjithanny | 12,202 | 11,192 | -8.3% |
| 19 | Rajakkad | 16,486 | 15,198 | -7.8% |
| 20 | Kumaramangalam (Part) | 15,522 | 14,865 | -4.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.