GaonData

Biggest population changes in Thiruvananthapuram district

Computed from 16 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Thiruvananthapuram district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kallikkad Perumkadavila 9,413 11,675 +24.0%
2 Vellalloor Kilimanoor 11,440 12,786 +11.8%
3 Navaikulam Kilimanoor 26,551 29,542 +11.3%
4 Koliyakode Vamanapuram 19,274 21,277 +10.4%
5 Palode Vamanapuram 14,922 16,099 +7.9%
6 Kollayil (Part) Perumkadavila 25,428 25,077 -1.4%
7 Ottasekharamangalam Perumkadavila 19,345 18,794 -2.9%
8 Vithura Vellanad 18,437 17,771 -3.6%
9 Kunnathukal Perumkadavila 33,274 30,409 -8.6%
10 Nagaroor Kilimanoor 15,072 13,726 -8.9%
11 Manikkal Vamanapuram 18,632 16,629 -10.8%
12 Anavoor Perumkadavila 14,667 12,438 -15.2%
13 Melthonnakkal Pothencode 18,150 14,776 -18.6%
14 Kudavoor Kilimanoor 14,151 11,160 -21.1%
15 Kurupuzha Vamanapuram 10,167 6,797 -33.1%
16 Vazhichal Perumkadavila 10,353 6,671 -35.6%

Villages that shrank most in Thiruvananthapuram district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Vazhichal Perumkadavila 10,353 6,671 -35.6%
2 Kurupuzha Vamanapuram 10,167 6,797 -33.1%
3 Kudavoor Kilimanoor 14,151 11,160 -21.1%
4 Melthonnakkal Pothencode 18,150 14,776 -18.6%
5 Anavoor Perumkadavila 14,667 12,438 -15.2%
6 Manikkal Vamanapuram 18,632 16,629 -10.8%
7 Nagaroor Kilimanoor 15,072 13,726 -8.9%
8 Kunnathukal Perumkadavila 33,274 30,409 -8.6%
9 Vithura Vellanad 18,437 17,771 -3.6%
10 Ottasekharamangalam Perumkadavila 19,345 18,794 -2.9%
11 Kollayil (Part) Perumkadavila 25,428 25,077 -1.4%
12 Palode Vamanapuram 14,922 16,099 +7.9%
13 Koliyakode Vamanapuram 19,274 21,277 +10.4%
14 Navaikulam Kilimanoor 26,551 29,542 +11.3%
15 Vellalloor Kilimanoor 11,440 12,786 +11.8%
16 Kallikkad Perumkadavila 9,413 11,675 +24.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.