GaonData

Biggest population changes in Agar Malwa district

Computed from 441 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Agar Malwa district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kushalpura Nalkheda 879 2,070 +135.5%
2 Guru Khedi Agar 539 1,260 +133.8%
3 Arniya Ka Kheda Susner 433 900 +107.8%
4 Nanora Susner 746 1,500 +101.1%
5 Gareli Nalkheda 809 1,552 +91.8%
6 Bayra Susner 263 500 +90.1%
7 Jhounta Barod 1,054 1,998 +89.6%
8 Sawani Barod 398 750 +88.4%
9 Rojhana Barod 431 800 +85.6%
10 Ankli Susner 1,050 1,905 +81.4%
11 Bajna Susner 726 1,302 +79.3%
12 Lakhaman Khedi Agar 420 750 +78.6%
13 Ramnagar Nalkheda 322 563 +74.8%
14 Khajuri Susner 1,091 1,901 +74.2%
15 Goyal Nalkheda 1,390 2,410 +73.4%
16 Kumhariya Agar Agar 384 655 +70.6%
17 Patpada Susner 486 826 +70.0%
18 Bhimpura Piplon Agar 177 300 +69.5%
19 Datya Khedi Susner 632 1,050 +66.1%
20 Napa Khedi Agar 443 725 +63.7%

Villages that shrank most in Agar Malwa district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Lakha Khedi Agar 269 175 -34.9%
2 Kheda Narela Barod 2,134 1,400 -34.4%
3 Kalariya Susner 844 572 -32.2%
4 Bans Khedi Agar 170 120 -29.4%
5 Gyasari Barod 295 217 -26.4%
6 Jetpura Susner 206 175 -15.1%
7 Pipalya Junnar Agar 331 290 -12.4%
8 Parsulya Khurd Susner 495 435 -12.1%
9 Bapcha Agar Agar 1,394 1,245 -10.7%
10 Kadmi Susner 555 500 -9.9%
11 Padalya Nalkheda 596 540 -9.4%
12 Tilwadiya Agar 824 750 -9.0%
13 Raipuriya Agar 376 347 -7.7%
14 Dharu Khedi Susner 1,096 1,025 -6.5%
15 Kabuli Nalkheda 513 480 -6.4%
16 Jakh Susner 1,164 1,095 -5.9%
17 Pipalya Songara Nalkheda 476 450 -5.5%
18 Bhimpura Agar Agar 642 610 -5.0%
19 Pipalya Vijay Barod 790 752 -4.8%
20 Rojadi Nalkheda 551 525 -4.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.