Biggest population changes in Anuppur district
Computed from 509 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Anuppur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahuda | 1,247 | 3,100 | +148.6% |
| 2 | Baidara | 487 | 1,208 | +148.1% |
| 3 | Kirar | 303 | 725 | +139.3% |
| 4 | Bahpuri | 431 | 984 | +128.3% |
| 5 | Pathaiti | 708 | 1,587 | +124.2% |
| 6 | Bicharpur | 316 | 688 | +117.7% |
| 7 | Parsel Khurd | 579 | 1,201 | +107.4% |
| 8 | Barbaspur | 1,311 | 2,700 | +106.0% |
| 9 | Kusera | 203 | 406 | +100.0% |
| 10 | Mauhari | 957 | 1,910 | +99.6% |
| 11 | Harra Tola | 1,355 | 2,600 | +91.9% |
| 12 | Choi | 1,081 | 2,040 | +88.7% |
| 13 | Majholi | 386 | 717 | +85.8% |
| 14 | Daldali | 197 | 358 | +81.7% |
| 15 | Salharo | 889 | 1,587 | +78.5% |
| 16 | Ranai Kapa | 1,245 | 2,134 | +71.4% |
| 17 | Haraswah | 535 | 914 | +70.8% |
| 18 | Dhiru Tola | 582 | 980 | +68.4% |
| 19 | Kusumhai | 392 | 660 | +68.4% |
| 20 | Mithu Mahua | 482 | 811 | +68.3% |
Villages that shrank most in Anuppur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sakra | 1,693 | 1,025 | -39.5% |
| 2 | Bakan | 658 | 400 | -39.2% |
| 3 | Dhawai | 1,063 | 666 | -37.4% |
| 4 | Tala | 295 | 197 | -33.2% |
| 5 | Sheoni Sangam | 471 | 320 | -32.1% |
| 6 | Rausar Khar | 1,338 | 925 | -30.9% |
| 7 | Koda | 1,012 | 705 | -30.3% |
| 8 | Reunda | 2,168 | 1,520 | -29.9% |
| 9 | Dogara Tola | 263 | 192 | -27.0% |
| 10 | Pakariya | 604 | 450 | -25.5% |
| 11 | Chhulha Tola | 644 | 480 | -25.5% |
| 12 | Nidawan | 697 | 520 | -25.4% |
| 13 | Jarwahi | 517 | 400 | -22.6% |
| 14 | Keshori | 364 | 287 | -21.1% |
| 15 | Chatha Tola | 1,001 | 800 | -20.1% |
| 16 | Bhagat Bandh | 711 | 570 | -19.8% |
| 17 | Chilihamar | 1,348 | 1,091 | -19.1% |
| 18 | Dabaniya | 260 | 220 | -15.4% |
| 19 | Pagna | 1,180 | 1,000 | -15.3% |
| 20 | Jharokha | 349 | 296 | -15.2% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.