GaonData

Biggest population changes in Balaghat district

Computed from 1,009 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Balaghat district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Takabarra Balaghat 762 1,900 +149.3%
2 Lahangakanhar Baihar 1,034 2,500 +141.8%
3 Songudda Birsa 1,377 3,216 +133.6%
4 Tekadi Tiju Khairlanji 1,043 2,423 +132.3%
5 Chhapara Paraswada 604 1,396 +131.1%
6 Dinatola Paraswada 745 1,710 +129.5%
7 Sonpuri Birsa 314 712 +126.8%
8 Serpar Paraswada 904 2,048 +126.5%
9 Deogaon Birsa 446 993 +122.7%
10 Sarra Lanji 927 2,063 +122.5%
11 Chanai Ryt. Paraswada 216 469 +117.1%
12 Khursipar Baihar 582 1,258 +116.2%
13 Jaitpuri Birsa 600 1,290 +115.0%
14 Manpur Lanji 909 1,950 +114.5%
15 Murjhad Khairlanji 907 1,897 +109.2%
16 Kochewada Balaghat 958 1,988 +107.5%
17 Gidori Birsa 1,065 2,200 +106.6%
18 Dongariya Baihar 265 538 +103.0%
19 Gorre Lanji 789 1,600 +102.8%
20 Umariya Paraswada 847 1,710 +101.9%

Villages that shrank most in Balaghat district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Khairlanji Theka Paraswada 649 393 -39.5%
2 Komo Baihar 492 300 -39.0%
3 Amai Khairlanji 3,048 1,875 -38.5%
4 Deogaon Birsa 805 508 -36.9%
5 Khursipar Baihar 920 590 -35.9%
6 Mureida Baihar 416 271 -34.9%
7 Tuma Birsa 326 220 -32.5%
8 Salhe Kirnapur 1,692 1,200 -29.1%
9 Lalpur Birsa 656 507 -22.7%
10 Churali Lanji 1,421 1,100 -22.6%
11 Bodal Jhola Kirnapur 206 160 -22.3%
12 Chhapala Theke Birsa 1,018 796 -21.8%
13 Dorli(Jadkharid) Waraseoni 951 746 -21.6%
14 Borikheda Mal. Katangi 1,008 795 -21.1%
15 Mohgaon Baihar 316 252 -20.3%
16 Samariya Baihar 801 642 -19.9%
17 Narangi Baihar 826 666 -19.4%
18 Dharmara Lanji 273 226 -17.2%
19 Pondi Paraswada 1,995 1,668 -16.4%
20 Fatehpurtheka Paraswada 299 250 -16.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 27 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 27 excluded in total. How the limits are set.