GaonData

Biggest population changes in Barwani district

Computed from 556 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Barwani district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bhilkheda Barwani 841 2,043 +142.9%
2 Kansul Pansemal 1,224 2,879 +135.2%
3 Jhamar Pati 960 2,250 +134.4%
4 Utawad Barwani 261 605 +131.8%
5 Mankui Pansemal 2,208 5,078 +130.0%
6 Atarsanbha Pati 2,586 5,905 +128.3%
7 Babultad Pansemal 119 267 +124.4%
8 Bagud Barwani 728 1,632 +124.2%
9 Dhawada Sendhawa 2,651 5,923 +123.4%
10 Dhaba Sendhawa 1,004 2,221 +121.2%
11 Bada Pati 102 225 +120.6%
12 Rajpur(Revenue Area) Rajpur 243 536 +120.6%
13 Donglyapani Pati 482 1,050 +117.8%
14 Kakariya Sendhawa 184 400 +117.4%
15 Alkhard Chhota Pansemal 288 600 +108.3%
16 Khadkya Mhow Rajpur 879 1,750 +99.1%
17 Deola Thikri 666 1,320 +98.2%
18 Baygore Pansemal 1,451 2,857 +96.9%
19 Tapkala Pati 268 525 +95.9%
20 Sonkhedi Sendhawa 1,428 2,791 +95.5%

Villages that shrank most in Barwani district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Ghodlya Pani Newali 2,062 1,251 -39.3%
2 Ramgarh Pati 406 254 -37.4%
3 Panali Sendhawa 3,042 1,923 -36.8%
4 Nainpura Barwani 154 98 -36.4%
5 Khokari Sendhawa 6,273 4,002 -36.2%
6 Pipliya Goi Sendhawa 1,620 1,150 -29.0%
7 Khetiya (Revenue Area) Pansemal 626 450 -28.1%
8 Amba Padaw Pansemal 1,181 916 -22.4%
9 Kamod Sendhawa 4,092 3,261 -20.3%
10 Bhatgawala Thikri 504 410 -18.6%
11 Taloon Buzurg Barwani 765 640 -16.3%
12 Salun Newali 1,666 1,396 -16.2%
13 Jamda Barwani 703 590 -16.1%
14 Rakhi Buzurg Pansemal 1,371 1,156 -15.7%
15 Ghatwa Thikri 2,485 2,097 -15.6%
16 Piparkund Pati 2,945 2,547 -13.5%
17 Saap Khadki Pansemal 644 560 -13.0%
18 Khedi Newali 2,101 1,981 -5.7%
19 Bhensdad Newali 877 830 -5.4%
20 Temla(Panwa) Rajpur 1,740 1,672 -3.9%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.