Biggest population changes in Burhanpur district
Computed from 228 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Burhanpur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pipalgaon Mafi | 274 | 680 | +148.2% |
| 2 | Khatla | 3,004 | 6,258 | +108.3% |
| 3 | Ratagarh Ryt | 1,138 | 2,276 | +100.0% |
| 4 | Bada Buzurg | 236 | 472 | +100.0% |
| 5 | Sawali Ryt | 1,398 | 2,780 | +98.9% |
| 6 | Jhirmiti | 999 | 1,939 | +94.1% |
| 7 | Sands Kalan | 1,672 | 3,215 | +92.3% |
| 8 | Jampani | 557 | 1,035 | +85.8% |
| 9 | Chakbara | 1,695 | 3,090 | +82.3% |
| 10 | Pura | 701 | 1,248 | +78.0% |
| 11 | Basali Ryt | 1,383 | 2,411 | +74.3% |
| 12 | Dabalikhurd | 2,609 | 4,416 | +69.3% |
| 13 | Khadki | 1,504 | 2,524 | +67.8% |
| 14 | Samariya | 534 | 895 | +67.6% |
| 15 | Dasghat | 926 | 1,540 | +66.3% |
| 16 | Bakadi | 5,882 | 9,765 | +66.0% |
| 17 | Chandni | 1,094 | 1,801 | +64.6% |
| 18 | Emagird | 17,233 | 28,000 | +62.5% |
| 19 | Nandura Kalan | 1,146 | 1,800 | +57.1% |
| 20 | Godhan Kheda | 244 | 370 | +51.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Burhanpur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daulatpura | 338 | 250 | -26.0% |
| 2 | Chidiya Mal | 1,300 | 973 | -25.1% |
| 3 | Jalandra | 2,484 | 1,970 | -20.7% |
| 4 | Shikarpura | 760 | 719 | -5.4% |
| 5 | Magrul | 1,146 | 1,137 | -0.8% |
| 6 | Jhir Panjariya | 5,403 | 5,400 | -0.1% |
| 7 | Dhulkot | 8,809 | 8,829 | +0.2% |
| 8 | Dhar alias Baildhad | 1,614 | 1,620 | +0.4% |
| 9 | Nasirabad | 1,697 | 1,705 | +0.5% |
| 10 | Sirpur Mal | 3,625 | 3,650 | +0.7% |
| 11 | Gambhirpura | 1,247 | 1,256 | +0.7% |
| 12 | Karkheda | 1,900 | 1,915 | +0.8% |
| 13 | Sukhpuri | 808 | 817 | +1.1% |
| 14 | Piprana | 1,822 | 1,850 | +1.5% |
| 15 | Bahadarpur | 9,645 | 9,850 | +2.1% |
| 16 | Pipalpani | 846 | 865 | +2.3% |
| 17 | Dhaba | 2,287 | 2,340 | +2.3% |
| 18 | Nimdhad Ryt | 2,116 | 2,165 | +2.3% |
| 19 | Khadkod | 1,885 | 1,929 | +2.3% |
| 20 | Satod | 1,043 | 1,075 | +3.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
5 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
5 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.