GaonData

Biggest population changes in Dhar district

Computed from 1,253 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Dhar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Pithyapura Tirla 123 305 +148.0%
2 Devipura Tirla 111 270 +143.2%
3 Surajpura Tirla 423 1,020 +141.1%
4 Ghuddaliya Bagh 536 1,287 +140.1%
5 Biyaghati Nalchha 219 525 +139.7%
6 Dedli-K Gandhwani 930 2,210 +137.6%
7 Bagoli Bagh 701 1,639 +133.8%
8 Singachori Bagh 528 1,233 +133.5%
9 Bariya Gandhwani 2,168 5,000 +130.6%
10 Sala Manawar 563 1,295 +130.0%
11 Samlipura Tirla 700 1,605 +129.3%
12 Khakariya Jhiri Sardarpur 524 1,200 +129.0%
13 Sunariya Sardarpur 180 412 +128.9%
14 Kakadkuwa Bagh 546 1,222 +123.8%
15 Palibaroda Badnawar 681 1,510 +121.7%
16 Piplimal Nalchha 220 486 +120.9%
17 Dongargaon Dharampuri 905 1,980 +118.8%
18 Gyanpura Tirla 1,390 3,010 +116.5%
19 Chandwadiya Kalan Badnawar 855 1,850 +116.4%
20 Badkachha Bagh 1,875 4,050 +116.0%

Villages that shrank most in Dhar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Rodada Gandhwani 2,087 1,280 -38.7%
2 Khidkiyakalan Tirla 554 340 -38.6%
3 Bhawriya Nisarpur 3,199 2,023 -36.8%
4 Nimarani Dharampuri 576 367 -36.3%
5 Lasangaon Dharampuri 175 112 -36.0%
6 Ibrahimpura Umarban 399 258 -35.3%
7 Kundali Nalchha 223 145 -35.0%
8 Malwadi Nisarpur 475 310 -34.7%
9 Tarapur Dharampuri 4,216 2,797 -33.7%
10 Kairva Umarban 2,129 1,435 -32.6%
11 Pipli Mal Nalchha 470 318 -32.3%
12 Baksana Nalchha 613 419 -31.6%
13 Chunyagadi Sardarpur 899 632 -29.7%
14 Reshamgara Badnawar 1,192 840 -29.5%
15 Samariya Nalchha 210 149 -29.1%
16 Bichhiya Sardarpur 2,387 1,710 -28.4%
17 Jhai Sardarpur 469 350 -25.4%
18 Randa Umarban 1,560 1,166 -25.3%
19 Hanumantya Manawar 689 515 -25.3%
20 Ganganagar Tirla 740 570 -23.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 20 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 20 excluded in total. How the limits are set.