GaonData

Biggest population changes in Neemuch district

Computed from 581 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Neemuch district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Arnya Manasa 843 1,955 +131.9%
2 Rughnathpura(Ratangarh) Jawad 157 360 +129.3%
3 Dhanderi Manasa 949 2,005 +111.3%
4 Manoharpura Kalan Jawad 216 401 +85.7%
5 Banjari Buzurg Manasa 469 850 +81.2%
6 Bakhtuni Manasa 1,147 2,058 +79.4%
7 Haripura [Ratangarh] Jawad 198 355 +79.3%
8 Jetpura Jawad 318 538 +69.2%
9 Taroli Jawad 353 590 +67.1%
10 Ruppura Manasa 100 165 +65.0%
11 Kundalaya Buzurg Manasa 184 302 +64.1%
12 Lanchh Neemuch 430 700 +62.8%
13 Bhagal Buzurg Manasa 490 790 +61.2%
14 Daulatpura Khurd Jawad 102 161 +57.8%
15 Khajuria Jawad 525 810 +54.3%
16 Malaheda Block Manasa 261 400 +53.3%
17 Baman Bardi Neemuch 1,277 1,900 +48.8%
18 Umar Jawad 1,544 2,293 +48.5%
19 Ranakhedi Jawad 407 600 +47.4%
20 Dhaneriyakhurd Neemuch 408 600 +47.1%

Villages that shrank most in Neemuch district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bangred Jawad 2,808 1,702 -39.4%
2 Sandbawdi Block Manasa 659 402 -39.0%
3 Arnya Jawad 969 630 -35.0%
4 Tamoti Manasa 1,444 975 -32.5%
5 Chainpura Neemuch 1,152 830 -27.9%
6 Arnyachudawat Neemuch 479 358 -25.3%
7 Palsoda Neemuch 4,287 3,250 -24.2%
8 Kunchdod Neemuch 3,355 2,640 -21.3%
9 Banskhedi Neemuch 136 110 -19.1%
10 Amlibhat Jawad 1,294 1,074 -17.0%
11 Jannod Manasa 2,917 2,546 -12.7%
12 Dharampura Manasa 263 234 -11.0%
13 Phoolpura Manasa 1,230 1,095 -11.0%
14 Khatikheda Jawad 351 315 -10.3%
15 Barkheda Chauhan Jawad 209 188 -10.1%
16 Junaparana Jawad 168 152 -9.5%
17 Depalpura Jawad 435 395 -9.2%
18 Bhatkheda Neemuch 1,592 1,455 -8.6%
19 Kesharpura Kalan Jawad 1,558 1,448 -7.1%
20 Khermalya Neemuch 390 365 -6.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 38 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 38 excluded in total. How the limits are set.