GaonData

Biggest population changes in Panna district

Computed from 813 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Panna district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Jhirmila Kariyapani Shahnagar 830 2,066 +148.9%
2 Palohi Pawai 600 1,460 +143.3%
3 Maukachh Ajaigarh 603 1,450 +140.5%
4 Simari Pondi Shahnagar 736 1,762 +139.4%
5 Diya Pawai 148 350 +136.5%
6 Bhadaiyan Ajaigarh 1,060 2,480 +134.0%
7 Kupna Pawai 1,074 2,500 +132.8%
8 Patna Khurd Gunour 234 535 +128.6%
9 Ganeshganj Pawai 311 700 +125.1%
10 Malhan Gunour 943 2,050 +117.4%
11 Bihariamemari Shahnagar 377 812 +115.4%
12 Chhijora Gunour 1,219 2,576 +111.3%
13 Gudmania Pawai 623 1,310 +110.3%
14 Majhgawan Shahnagar 638 1,327 +108.0%
15 Mdeyan Pawai 506 1,050 +107.5%
16 Dharampura Gunour 474 980 +106.8%
17 Bilhai Gunour 285 589 +106.7%
18 Pipariya Pawai 392 810 +106.6%
19 Sithauli Gunour 1,128 2,315 +105.2%
20 Bador Panna 755 1,544 +104.5%

Villages that shrank most in Panna district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Shikarpura Pawai 604 369 -38.9%
2 Udki Gunour 131 81 -38.2%
3 Silgi Panna 1,704 1,135 -33.4%
4 Rakseha Pawai 120 80 -33.3%
5 Makkepala Shahnagar 479 320 -33.2%
6 Ghutehi Pawai 681 457 -32.9%
7 Icholiya Ajaigarh 515 350 -32.0%
8 Mahguwan Gunour 590 425 -28.0%
9 Shahpura Ajaigarh 1,679 1,216 -27.6%
10 Jigdaha Panna 2,069 1,500 -27.5%
11 Kutmi Bandora Pawai 309 225 -27.2%
12 Kotwalipur Panna 140 102 -27.1%
13 Budha Pawai 122 90 -26.2%
14 Konda Pawai 206 152 -26.2%
15 Mohanpura Panna 567 420 -25.9%
16 Vyauhari Gunour 215 160 -25.6%
17 Dhaukhan Shahnagar 112 84 -25.0%
18 Baraunha Gunour 576 434 -24.6%
19 Manjha Panna 439 331 -24.6%
20 Pipariya Khurd Gunour 329 250 -24.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 33 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 33 excluded in total. How the limits are set.