GaonData

Biggest population changes in Rewa district

Computed from 1,746 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Rewa district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Chorawa Naigarhi 209 513 +145.4%
2 Mahari Sirmour 701 1,720 +145.4%
3 Gahira Naigarhi 204 500 +145.1%
4 Chitti Sirmour 877 2,125 +142.3%
5 Chhadanhai Naigarhi 188 450 +139.4%
6 Paliya (351) Raipur Karchuliyan 358 852 +138.0%
7 Gurh Jawa 785 1,865 +137.6%
8 Shah Naigarhi 102 240 +135.3%
9 Dagdaua Mauganj 2,301 5,410 +135.1%
10 Majhigawan Sirmour 555 1,300 +134.2%
11 Bahar Naigarhi 107 250 +133.6%
12 Itaha Dandi Gangev 120 280 +133.3%
13 Dadh Sirmour 133 310 +133.1%
14 Bari Khurd Teonthar 237 552 +132.9%
15 Dakwar Rewa 387 900 +132.6%
16 Belaha Nankar Naigarhi 282 653 +131.6%
17 Thaukhar Rewa 130 300 +130.8%
18 Nandanipur Sirmour 577 1,331 +130.7%
19 Madha Sirmour 782 1,800 +130.2%
20 Shivpura Hanumana 263 600 +128.1%

Villages that shrank most in Rewa district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bara (393) Raipur Karchuliyan 965 588 -39.1%
2 Pahadinirpatsingh Mauganj 862 528 -38.8%
3 Paipkhara Sirmour 700 432 -38.3%
4 Madrawal Hanumana 516 320 -38.0%
5 Bhusudi Rewa 639 400 -37.4%
6 Suarha Naigarhi 836 530 -36.6%
7 Naraini Mauganj 1,620 1,030 -36.4%
8 Hardoli Jawa 2,761 1,765 -36.1%
9 Madarha Sirmour 301 195 -35.2%
10 Baharadabar Mauganj 2,311 1,500 -35.1%
11 Koodi Mauganj 303 197 -35.0%
12 Kalyanpur(55) Jawa 2,304 1,500 -34.9%
13 Itar Raipur Karchuliyan 1,138 745 -34.5%
14 Bhanigawan Jawa 5,228 3,428 -34.4%
15 Deoraphareda Raipur Karchuliyan 2,594 1,704 -34.3%
16 Bareti Kalan Teonthar 2,534 1,679 -33.7%
17 Sirsa Gangev 897 600 -33.1%
18 Ansara Jawa 1,142 765 -33.0%
19 Majhigawan Teonthar 376 256 -31.9%
20 Raksaha Kalan Teonthar 1,480 1,010 -31.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 272 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 5 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 277 excluded in total. How the limits are set.