GaonData

Biggest population changes in Shahdol district

Computed from 705 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Shahdol district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Musrafulwari Burhar 1,004 2,500 +149.0%
2 Atariyatola Gohparu 379 915 +141.4%
3 Khichadi Burhar 209 495 +136.8%
4 Salda Gohparu 680 1,608 +136.5%
5 Karpa Jaisinghnagar 983 2,315 +135.5%
6 Kharhara Beohari 425 1,000 +135.3%
7 Deori Tola Sohagpur 941 2,163 +129.9%
8 Baheraha Gohparu 465 1,026 +120.7%
9 Harraha Tola Burhar 392 850 +116.8%
10 Dhanpura Sohagpur 832 1,796 +115.9%
11 Bhikhampur Burhar 558 1,200 +115.0%
12 Bharri Gohparu 498 1,033 +107.4%
13 Kolmi Burhar 599 1,225 +104.5%
14 Jaitpur Burhar 2,558 5,169 +102.1%
15 Atariya Sohagpur 450 900 +100.0%
16 Chhinmar Burhar 153 305 +99.3%
17 Chachai Beohari 3,167 6,300 +98.9%
18 Tediya Tola Burhar 716 1,400 +95.5%
19 Duladar Gohparu 744 1,446 +94.3%
20 Hanumanpur Beohari 1,041 2,000 +92.1%

Villages that shrank most in Shahdol district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Charkwah Jaisinghnagar 794 501 -36.9%
2 Silpari Gohparu 811 519 -36.0%
3 Bodri Sohagpur 3,513 2,250 -36.0%
4 Kholhad Sohagpur 1,511 981 -35.1%
5 Kudra Tola Jaisinghnagar 906 590 -34.9%
6 Dongaritola Burhar 342 233 -31.9%
7 Sigudi Sohagpur 656 455 -30.6%
8 Dholar Jaisinghnagar 1,228 854 -30.5%
9 Rohaniya Sohagpur 692 490 -29.2%
10 Nagadwah Jaisinghnagar 710 504 -29.0%
11 Jharaunsi Beohari 1,155 820 -29.0%
12 Kamta Burhar 1,194 862 -27.8%
13 Bargawan Burhar 1,284 935 -27.2%
14 Vikrampur Sohagpur 1,814 1,335 -26.4%
15 Gadhaha Kund Burhar 445 330 -25.8%
16 Kolmi Burhar 874 658 -24.7%
17 Nipaniya Sohagpur 1,464 1,107 -24.4%
18 Malda Gohparu 582 445 -23.5%
19 Silpari Sohagpur 483 379 -21.5%
20 Dhamni Khurd Sohagpur 284 226 -20.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 20 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 20 excluded in total. How the limits are set.