GaonData

Biggest population changes in Sheopur district

Computed from 453 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Sheopur district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kotra Sheopur 1,184 2,828 +138.8%
2 Rampura Dang Karahal 555 1,317 +137.3%
3 Sarangpur Vijaypur 1,201 2,800 +133.1%
4 Nagdi Sheopur 1,143 2,650 +131.8%
5 Kyarpura Sheopur 972 2,221 +128.5%
6 Tekna Sheopur 198 435 +119.7%
7 Daduni Sheopur 1,091 2,390 +119.1%
8 Chainpur Vijaypur 450 975 +116.7%
9 Nayagaon Lakha Karahal 835 1,784 +113.7%
10 Dukalya Kheda Sheopur 285 600 +110.5%
11 Amet Karahal 1,109 2,245 +102.4%
12 Sunswada Karahal 1,055 2,100 +99.0%
13 Mundla Sheopur 792 1,563 +97.3%
14 Kishanpura Vijaypur 394 770 +95.4%
15 Bhawarkuwa Karahal 414 800 +93.2%
16 Simrai Vijaypur 892 1,722 +93.0%
17 Aroda Vijaypur 1,417 2,612 +84.3%
18 Girdharpur Karahal 697 1,250 +79.3%
19 Doondi Kheda Karahal 632 1,105 +74.8%
20 Jakhda Jagir Karahal 574 995 +73.3%

Villages that shrank most in Sheopur district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kashipur Sheopur 1,084 668 -38.4%
2 Nerkheda Vijaypur 1,098 700 -36.3%
3 Sewapur Sheopur 720 470 -34.7%
4 Dongarpur (Gaswani) Vijaypur 574 405 -29.4%
5 Galmanya Sheopur 1,309 941 -28.1%
6 Makraoda Khurd Sheopur 561 415 -26.0%
7 Syarda Vijaypur 2,912 2,262 -22.3%
8 Jamurdi Vijaypur 1,211 1,010 -16.6%
9 Talawna Sheopur 950 805 -15.3%
10 Chak-Majeedpur Karahal 1,277 1,088 -14.8%
11 Badodiya Bindi Sheopur 1,267 1,107 -12.6%
12 Bamorihala Sheopur 578 518 -10.4%
13 Dodai Kalan Vijaypur 2,563 2,336 -8.9%
14 Malpura Sheopur 466 425 -8.8%
15 Sohi Khurd Sheopur 272 250 -8.1%
16 Pandoli Sheopur 865 797 -7.9%
17 Bada Kheda Sheopur 642 592 -7.8%
18 Barkhera Sheopur 379 356 -6.1%
19 Panar Karahal 1,086 1,030 -5.2%
20 Tongni Sheopur 605 588 -2.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 8 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 8 excluded in total. How the limits are set.