GaonData

Biggest population changes in Sidhi district

Computed from 825 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Sidhi district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sajwani Kalan(Sajmani Kalan) Sihawal 364 900 +147.3%
2 Dharamduari Kusmi 183 448 +144.8%
3 Dadaur Majhauli 971 2,300 +136.9%
4 Hinauta Majhauli 203 480 +136.4%
5 Kudiya (34) Rampur Naikin 1,367 3,200 +134.1%
6 Bamuri Gajkaransingh Sihawal 180 420 +133.3%
7 Kuseda Sihawal 1,375 3,200 +132.7%
8 Semra Kusmi 346 800 +131.2%
9 Kasihawa Sidhi 395 906 +129.4%
10 Bamuri Unmukt Sihawal 142 325 +128.9%
11 Bhelki Khurd Sidhi 1,207 2,762 +128.8%
12 Amallakpur Sidhi 400 915 +128.8%
13 Dhadha Sihawal 136 310 +127.9%
14 Bhaluha Kala Sidhi 692 1,560 +125.4%
15 Dihuli Tikar No 3 Sihawal 1,079 2,407 +123.1%
16 Bodaraha Sidhi 323 720 +122.9%
17 Bari Kothar Sihawal 1,391 3,100 +122.9%
18 Pathraula Majhauli 1,873 4,160 +122.1%
19 Nebuha West Sidhi 1,157 2,543 +119.8%
20 Dalapipar Majhauli 1,350 2,950 +118.5%

Villages that shrank most in Sidhi district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Satpahra Sihawal 287 180 -37.3%
2 Chunaha Sidhi 108 68 -37.0%
3 Dadari Kusmi 617 422 -31.6%
4 Jaraundha Sidhi 848 600 -29.3%
5 Machharkata Kusmi 220 156 -29.1%
6 Bendau (Bendo) Kusmi 322 235 -27.0%
7 Kukdijhar Sidhi 2,498 1,825 -26.9%
8 Kathautiya Kusmi 271 200 -26.2%
9 Deoghata Sidhi 770 602 -21.8%
10 Deem Kusmi 439 350 -20.3%
11 Bahera Sihawal 745 600 -19.5%
12 Kudiya Kothar Rampur Naikin 606 500 -17.5%
13 Sukwari North Tola Sidhi 388 322 -17.0%
14 Bisaindha Tola Sidhi 433 362 -16.4%
15 Magara Kusmi 175 148 -15.4%
16 Bahera Sihawal 603 510 -15.4%
17 Baskati Sidhi 286 242 -15.4%
18 Bhuimand Kusmi 1,809 1,550 -14.3%
19 Kachahariya Majhauli 344 301 -12.5%
20 Kolgarh Majhauli 604 530 -12.3%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 42 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 42 excluded in total. How the limits are set.