GaonData

Biggest population changes in Umaria district

Computed from 421 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Umaria district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Badari Manpur 567 1,380 +143.4%
2 Salaiya Pali 923 2,230 +141.6%
3 Dhaurai Pali 886 2,118 +139.1%
4 Barhai Kudari Karkeli 387 895 +131.3%
5 Bhundi Karkeli 1,091 2,470 +126.4%
6 Dhanwahi Karkeli 1,042 2,289 +119.7%
7 Bhagda Karkeli 563 1,196 +112.4%
8 Kalda Karkeli 1,258 2,620 +108.3%
9 Madain Tola Manpur 578 1,200 +107.6%
10 Takhatpur Karkeli 778 1,610 +106.9%
11 Ufri Karkeli 1,018 2,050 +101.4%
12 Tekan Karkeli 249 493 +98.0%
13 Mahimar Karkeli 750 1,477 +96.9%
14 Jhala Karkeli 735 1,415 +92.5%
15 Chandpur Karkeli 1,329 2,525 +90.0%
16 Jhikatal Karkeli 624 1,175 +88.3%
17 Guda Karkeli 463 871 +88.1%
18 Hadha Karkeli 872 1,629 +86.8%
19 Anchla Karkeli 1,210 2,175 +79.8%
20 Salaiya Manpur 1,414 2,525 +78.6%

Villages that shrank most in Umaria district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Patnar Kalan Pali 366 223 -39.1%
2 Atariya Karkeli 690 421 -39.0%
3 Dongargawan Karkeli 849 600 -29.3%
4 Dhangi Karkeli 813 575 -29.3%
5 Jaldhara Karkeli 451 322 -28.6%
6 Kohka Karkeli 927 680 -26.6%
7 Gohadi Manpur 149 110 -26.2%
8 Kaspani Karkeli 464 348 -25.0%
9 Kotari Manpur 2,263 1,700 -24.9%
10 Amaha Karkeli 201 152 -24.4%
11 Majhauli Khurd Karkeli 1,139 867 -23.9%
12 Khamhariya Khurd Pali 525 400 -23.8%
13 Mardar Karkeli 458 350 -23.6%
14 Amdari Karkeli 270 210 -22.2%
15 Dhanhari Karkeli 246 192 -21.9%
16 Chimta Manpur 734 582 -20.7%
17 Malachua Pali 1,355 1,085 -19.9%
18 Mahroai Pali 434 348 -19.8%
19 Lalpur Karkeli 182 147 -19.2%
20 Chandoul Karkeli 992 812 -18.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 18 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 18 excluded in total. How the limits are set.