GaonData

Biggest population changes in Aurangabad district

Computed from 935 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Aurangabad district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bidkin Paithan 19,596 47,000 +139.8%
2 Saigavhan Kanand 2,533 6,000 +136.9%
3 Mukpath Sillod 677 1,600 +136.3%
4 Bhildari (nagad) Kanand 425 1,000 +135.3%
5 Rampuri Aurangabad 749 1,750 +133.6%
6 Chanakwadi Paithan 867 2,025 +133.6%
7 Shernapur Aurangabad 1,712 3,963 +131.5%
8 Shekhapur Khultabad 649 1,500 +131.1%
9 Nipani Aurangabad 1,607 3,700 +130.2%
10 Tandulwadi Kanand 1,030 2,300 +123.3%
11 Shekta Paithan 2,241 4,979 +122.2%
12 Khaparkheda Kanand 651 1,435 +120.4%
13 Satkund Tanda. Kanand 466 1,020 +118.9%
14 Ghanegaon Soegaon 465 998 +114.6%
15 Wadod Chatha Sillod 3,514 7,514 +113.8%
16 Gadana Khultabad 2,688 5,700 +112.0%
17 Belkheda Kanand 809 1,700 +110.1%
18 Lenapur Soegaon 487 1,000 +105.3%
19 Jarandi Soegaon 3,451 7,006 +103.0%
20 Malegaon Soegaon 599 1,200 +100.3%

Villages that shrank most in Aurangabad district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Daskul Vaijapur 252 155 -38.5%
2 Pimpri Sillod 1,121 696 -37.9%
3 Pimpri Antur Soegaon 383 250 -34.7%
4 Lakhmapurwadi Vaijapur 229 150 -34.5%
5 Banoti Tanda Soegaon 705 477 -32.3%
6 Belgaon Vaijapur 1,805 1,345 -25.5%
7 Ladgaon Aurangabad 1,254 937 -25.3%
8 Sahangaon Kanand 437 350 -19.9%
9 Ghorkund Soegaon 743 597 -19.6%
10 Nanda Soegaon 173 140 -19.1%
11 Sarati Sillod 511 434 -15.1%
12 Khamjalgaon Paithan 588 500 -15.0%
13 Potul Gangapur 832 710 -14.7%
14 Eklahera Gangapur 1,230 1,053 -14.4%
15 Bramhagavhan Paithan 922 790 -14.3%
16 Didgaon Sillod 874 750 -14.2%
17 Dharla Sillod 781 679 -13.1%
18 Shafiabad Kanand 401 350 -12.7%
19 Dharmapur Aurangabad 343 300 -12.5%
20 Tanda Kh. Paithan 567 497 -12.3%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 10 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 11 excluded in total. How the limits are set.