GaonData

Biggest population changes in Latur district

Computed from 649 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Latur district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Hoti Renapur 1,635 3,988 +143.9%
2 Waigaon Ahemadpur 2,081 5,000 +140.3%
3 Rajewadi Ausa 639 1,500 +134.7%
4 Chincholi Raowadi Latur 1,899 4,311 +127.0%
5 Sevadasnagar Latur 810 1,800 +122.2%
6 Chilwantwadi Nilanga 1,672 3,675 +119.8%
7 Ringani Ausa 315 680 +115.9%
8 Malegaon (kalyani) Nilanga 2,525 5,400 +113.9%
9 Malwati Latur 1,777 3,780 +112.7%
10 Ramwadi (Pangaon) Renapur 543 1,152 +112.2%
11 Mahamdapur Latur 1,167 2,425 +107.8%
12 Darji Borgaon Renapur 1,815 3,750 +106.6%
13 Jauwadi Ausa 729 1,500 +105.8%
14 Bansawargaon Chakur 678 1,390 +105.0%
15 Anandwadi Ausa 900 1,800 +100.0%
16 Mudgad [ekoji] Nilanga 2,692 5,300 +96.9%
17 Shivani Lakh Ausa 2,374 4,500 +89.5%
18 Hatkarwadi Chakur 330 620 +87.9%
19 Sangvi (Ghugi) Shirur Anantpal 764 1,430 +87.2%
20 Anandwadi Deoni 920 1,684 +83.0%

Villages that shrank most in Latur district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sabitwadi Nilanga 434 275 -36.6%
2 Kolgaon Renapur 2,119 1,400 -33.9%
3 Tiwatgyal Udgir 629 450 -28.5%
4 Bortal Tanda Udgir 1,032 751 -27.2%
5 Rui Ahemadpur 1,591 1,178 -26.0%
6 Batanpur Deoni 1,005 750 -25.4%
7 Maroti Tanda Udgir 174 130 -25.3%
8 Jamalpur Ausa 1,158 870 -24.9%
9 Gutti Jalkot 4,051 3,052 -24.7%
10 Ajani Deoni 920 700 -23.9%
11 Yeldara Jalkot 888 684 -23.0%
12 Viral Jalkot 1,060 842 -20.6%
13 Chimachiwadi Udgir 636 509 -20.0%
14 Ramegaon Ausa 2,235 1,800 -19.5%
15 Domgaon Jalkot 882 712 -19.3%
16 Salgara Ahemadpur 721 590 -18.2%
17 Sangam Deoni 945 775 -18.0%
18 Khadak Umarga Nilanga 998 825 -17.3%
19 Wangdari Renapur 1,650 1,396 -15.4%
20 Phawde Wadi Renapur 1,585 1,361 -14.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.