GaonData

Biggest population changes in Nashik district

Computed from 639 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Nashik district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Chankapur Kalwan 2,015 5,015 +148.9%
2 Bordaiwat Baglan 651 1,524 +134.1%
3 Kundewadi Sinnar 1,485 3,444 +131.9%
4 Fattepur Sinnar 863 2,000 +131.8%
5 Borli Igatpuri 616 1,420 +130.5%
6 Chinchpada Surgana 391 850 +117.4%
7 Dhanoli Kalwan 934 1,955 +109.3%
8 Waghyachiwadi (N.V.) Igatpuri 706 1,421 +101.3%
9 Pohi Nandgaon 654 1,260 +92.7%
10 Kothare Kh. Malegaon 1,241 2,322 +87.1%
11 Gangodbari Peth 434 778 +79.3%
12 Manikpunj Nandgaon 1,357 2,401 +76.9%
13 Kerovanagar (N.V.) Baglan 330 583 +76.7%
14 Avachitwadi (N.V.) Igatpuri 638 1,124 +76.2%
15 Usthale Peth 1,695 2,985 +76.1%
16 Golegaon Niphad 754 1,326 +75.9%
17 Dheku Bk. Nandgaon 720 1,260 +75.0%
18 Ranvihir Peth 681 1,180 +73.3%
19 Ambapani Peth 251 430 +71.3%
20 Yesgaon Bk Malegaon 3,699 6,261 +69.3%

Villages that shrank most in Nashik district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sawarna (N.V.) Peth 1,131 728 -35.6%
2 Mahaje Dindori 1,769 1,170 -33.9%
3 Maralgoi Kh. Niphad 1,325 887 -33.1%
4 Bhoryachapada Dindori 928 631 -32.0%
5 Borale Chandwad 1,294 914 -29.4%
6 Shirasgaon Lauki Yeola 1,890 1,364 -27.8%
7 Virshet Kalwan 1,060 778 -26.6%
8 Badagi Peth 612 450 -26.5%
9 Umarpada (N.V.) Peth 585 431 -26.3%
10 Paste Sinnar 1,800 1,332 -26.0%
11 Lauki Shiras Yeola 1,491 1,125 -24.6%
12 Chamdari Dindori 462 350 -24.2%
13 Pardevi Igatpuri 711 550 -22.6%
14 Waki Igatpuri 1,214 950 -21.8%
15 Sadrale Dindori 537 425 -20.9%
16 Khirad Kalwan 1,393 1,104 -20.8%
17 Saturli Igatpuri 453 363 -19.9%
18 Gopalkhadi Kalwan 957 776 -18.9%
19 Bhaur Deola 4,262 3,500 -17.9%
20 Kanchangaon Igatpuri 1,906 1,612 -15.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.