GaonData

Biggest population changes in Osmanabad district

Computed from 474 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Osmanabad district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kasgiwadi Omerga 1,013 2,315 +128.5%
2 Kaddora Omerga 1,423 3,240 +127.7%
3 Varnalwadi Omerga 1,069 2,380 +122.6%
4 Guruwadi Omerga 584 1,280 +119.2%
5 Kadamapur Omerga 773 1,689 +118.5%
6 Haladgaon Kalamb 551 1,200 +117.8%
7 Shirgapur Tuljapur 725 1,570 +116.5%
8 Bendga Omerga 2,483 5,090 +105.0%
9 Kati Tuljapur 6,875 14,050 +104.4%
10 Hingangaon kh. Paranda 867 1,750 +101.8%
11 Acharya Tanda Omerga 209 421 +101.4%
12 Wadibamani Osmanabad 2,605 5,115 +96.3%
13 Moha Kalamb 6,348 12,000 +89.0%
14 Khuttewadi Tuljapur 397 722 +81.9%
15 Sarola Bk. Osmanabad 4,300 7,800 +81.4%
16 Ashta Bhoom 2,023 3,658 +80.8%
17 Naliwadgaon Bhoom 900 1,618 +79.8%
18 Supatgaon Omerga 1,692 3,000 +77.3%
19 Katewadi Omerga 722 1,280 +77.3%
20 Dhorala Kalamb 2,432 4,300 +76.8%

Villages that shrank most in Osmanabad district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sardewadi Tuljapur 806 500 -38.0%
2 Borgaon raje Osmanabad 1,668 1,200 -28.1%
3 Parewadi Paranda 948 700 -26.2%
4 Karla Tuljapur 1,875 1,404 -25.1%
5 Golegaon Washi 913 721 -21.0%
6 Rajegaon Lohara 1,242 1,005 -19.1%
7 Walgud Osmanabad 792 646 -18.4%
8 Domgaon Paranda 1,578 1,300 -17.6%
9 Lohara Paranda 1,129 945 -16.3%
10 Bhawanwadi Bhoom 662 562 -15.1%
11 Hiwara Bhoom 1,220 1,054 -13.6%
12 Rosa Paranda 1,028 900 -12.4%
13 Katrabad Paranda 762 685 -10.1%
14 Ambejawalga Osmanabad 3,982 3,600 -9.6%
15 Hingangaon Bk. Paranda 1,979 1,800 -9.0%
16 Dudhanal Omerga 467 426 -8.8%
17 Rohkal Paranda 1,677 1,535 -8.5%
18 Sarati Tuljapur 1,262 1,164 -7.8%
19 Salgara Tatur Tuljapur 1,947 1,800 -7.5%
20 Khanapur Paranda 1,134 1,050 -7.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.