GaonData

Biggest population changes in Palghar district

Computed from 417 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Palghar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Onde Vikramgad 1,321 3,275 +147.9%
2 SHISANE Dahanu 1,910 4,554 +138.4%
3 Man Palghar 2,237 5,000 +123.5%
4 Patilgaon Vasai 1,529 3,417 +123.5%
5 Masangaon Talasari 1,264 2,786 +120.4%
6 Wehelpada Vikramgad 2,459 5,284 +114.9%
7 Varkhunti Palghar 792 1,700 +114.7%
8 Khutad Palghar 602 1,280 +112.6%
9 Tanashi Dahanu 1,053 2,165 +105.6%
10 Dolhari Kh. Vikramgad 2,260 4,563 +101.9%
11 Aapati Wada 448 904 +101.8%
12 Vilatgaon Talasari 850 1,710 +101.2%
13 Vp-Laxminagar Mokhada 582 1,151 +97.8%
14 Savarpada Jawhar 865 1,674 +93.5%
15 Khadkhad Jawhar 682 1,318 +93.3%
16 Chilhar Palghar 777 1,497 +92.7%
17 Khadaki Vikramgad 2,424 4,613 +90.3%
18 Pinjal Wada 911 1,725 +89.3%
19 Sumadi Palghar 1,066 1,995 +87.2%
20 Vittalnagar Vikramgad 959 1,785 +86.1%

Villages that shrank most in Palghar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Nagave Palghar 542 333 -38.6%
2 Shil Vikramgad 697 445 -36.1%
3 Gangodi Dahanu 1,363 878 -35.6%
4 Khambale Dahanu 1,104 735 -33.4%
5 Kawale Vikramgad 1,023 696 -32.0%
6 Nikane Dahanu 1,975 1,375 -30.4%
7 Jawhar Rural Jawhar 2,807 1,971 -29.8%
8 Zadkhaire Wada 408 300 -26.5%
9 Tokarale Palghar 235 175 -25.5%
10 Ghonsai Wada 976 732 -25.0%
11 Kochale Mokhada 1,077 815 -24.3%
12 Vp-Dudhgaon Mokhada 828 629 -24.0%
13 Dabhale Dahanu 1,328 1,010 -23.9%
14 Khaire Tarf Wada Wada 725 564 -22.2%
15 Newale Palghar 513 400 -22.0%
16 Karanjvira Dahanu 1,213 947 -21.9%
17 Dengachimet Jawhar 1,445 1,145 -20.8%
18 Asangaon Bk. Dahanu 1,666 1,333 -20.0%
19 Dehane Dahanu 3,214 2,641 -17.8%
20 Makane Kapase Palghar 2,146 1,764 -17.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 2 excluded in total. How the limits are set.