GaonData

Biggest population changes in Raigad district

Computed from 910 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Raigad district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Siddheshwar Bk Sudhagad 877 2,177 +148.2%
2 Velas Shrivardhan 386 956 +147.7%
3 Mukte Roha 303 750 +147.5%
4 Shiste Shrivardhan 642 1,551 +141.6%
5 Unhere Bk Sudhagad 231 556 +140.7%
6 Tarankhop Pen 1,443 3,448 +138.9%
7 Hashiware Alibag 561 1,294 +130.7%
8 Ashtami Roha 146 336 +130.1%
9 Gothivali Khalapur 360 799 +121.9%
10 Parkhande Khalapur 386 835 +116.3%
11 Dakhane Mangaon 760 1,637 +115.4%
12 Tadgaon Sudhagad 448 960 +114.3%
13 Kalamshet Tala 292 619 +112.0%
14 Tamhanshet Roha 424 898 +111.8%
15 Nidi Tarf Ashtami Roha 616 1,268 +105.8%
16 Atone Sudhagad 418 851 +103.6%
17 Nevali Panvel 1,460 2,959 +102.7%
18 Jadhavwadi Roha 188 380 +102.1%
19 Gaichol Roha 152 306 +101.3%
20 Nere Panvel 3,569 7,169 +100.9%

Villages that shrank most in Raigad district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gaulwadi Roha 460 283 -38.5%
2 Ravet Alibag 503 315 -37.4%
3 Garpoli Karjat 795 508 -36.1%
4 Mograj Karjat 630 415 -34.1%
5 Khambere Roha 452 299 -33.9%
6 Mangrul Mangaon 545 362 -33.6%
7 Kandroli Tarf Boreti Khalapur 1,127 764 -32.2%
8 Pilosari Sudhagad 495 336 -32.1%
9 Widsai Sudhagad 162 110 -32.1%
10 Vave Alibag 1,157 791 -31.6%
11 Ashane Karjat 774 539 -30.4%
12 Kacherpada Uran 1,776 1,237 -30.4%
13 Aweti Alibag 635 448 -29.4%
14 Wali Roha 633 449 -29.1%
15 Birwadi Roha 477 340 -28.7%
16 Ase Karjat 194 140 -27.8%
17 Patani Pandapur Pen 1,683 1,215 -27.8%
18 Shiravali Tarf Chhattishi Khalapur 713 517 -27.5%
19 Warad Khalapur 194 141 -27.3%
20 Wadwali Mahad 784 573 -26.9%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 17 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 18 excluded in total. How the limits are set.