GaonData

Biggest population changes in Sindhudurg district

Computed from 358 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Sindhudurg district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gangeshwar Kankavali 346 850 +145.7%
2 Nimatwadi Deogad 629 1,536 +144.2%
3 Kalvi Deogad 604 1,433 +137.3%
4 Malond Malvan 434 908 +109.2%
5 Velagar Vengurla 419 819 +95.5%
6 Gharap Dodamarg 283 540 +90.8%
7 Pat Kudal 1,814 3,421 +88.6%
8 Masade Malvan 474 856 +80.6%
9 Kandalgaon Malvan 770 1,373 +78.3%
10 Awade Dodamarg 157 273 +73.9%
11 Tembavali Deogad 829 1,433 +72.9%
12 Medha Vengurla 962 1,655 +72.0%
13 Wagheri Kankavali 568 950 +67.3%
14 Hindale Deogad 1,714 2,855 +66.6%
15 Fansavade Sawantwadi 251 407 +62.1%
16 Bambuli Tarf Haveli Kudal 594 963 +62.1%
17 Varavade Kankavali 1,793 2,890 +61.2%
18 Tank Vengurla 948 1,526 +61.0%
19 Raygaon Kudal 1,007 1,561 +55.0%
20 Bagamala Deogad 303 466 +53.8%

Villages that shrank most in Sindhudurg district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Zare-2 Dodamarg 262 162 -38.2%
2 Upale Vaibhavawadi 421 264 -37.3%
3 Wasoli Kudal 509 325 -36.1%
4 Tiravade Tarf Soundal Vaibhavawadi 447 290 -35.1%
5 Kumbhavade Vaibhavawadi 612 412 -32.7%
6 Ranjangaon Kankavali 346 235 -32.1%
7 Nerur K.Narur Kudal 1,633 1,112 -31.9%
8 Girgaon Kudal 623 425 -31.8%
9 Magvane Malvan 252 174 -30.9%
10 Talebajar Deogad 689 477 -30.8%
11 Wadi Dangmode Malvan 183 127 -30.6%
12 Tiravade Tarf Kharepatan Vaibhavawadi 824 575 -30.2%
13 Mangavali Vaibhavawadi 1,264 890 -29.6%
14 Mehbubnagar Vaibhavawadi 1,372 979 -28.6%
15 Bagwadi Malvan 397 285 -28.2%
16 Sakirde Kudal 192 138 -28.1%
17 Sarmale Sawantwadi 850 613 -27.9%
18 Shriramwadi Vengurla 693 500 -27.9%
19 Bandiwade Bk. Malvan 272 197 -27.6%
20 Trimbak Malvan 575 417 -27.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 4 excluded in total. How the limits are set.