GaonData

Biggest population changes in Washim district

Computed from 459 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Washim district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sakra Washim 1,039 2,248 +116.4%
2 Kolhi Malegaon 354 764 +115.8%
3 Ansing Washim 11,809 25,000 +111.7%
4 Wakad Pr. Washim Malegaon 432 875 +102.5%
5 Bhuli Manora 3,007 5,890 +95.9%
6 Jodgavhan Malegaon 1,201 2,114 +76.0%
7 Tapowan Risod 262 460 +75.6%
8 Vasant Nagar Manora 192 331 +72.4%
9 Chikhalgad Mangrulpir 1,100 1,873 +70.3%
10 Jogeshwari Risod 1,072 1,800 +67.9%
11 Takali Bk. Karanja 490 819 +67.1%
12 Wanoja Mangrulpir 4,356 7,250 +66.4%
13 Dodki Washim 559 930 +66.4%
14 Kurhad Karanja 156 259 +66.0%
15 Jaikhed Risod 241 400 +66.0%
16 Chichamba Pen Risod 2,066 3,400 +64.6%
17 Mutha Malegaon 590 950 +61.0%
18 Tandali Shewai Washim 1,526 2,437 +59.7%
19 Sawargaon Mangrulpir 1,642 2,600 +58.3%
20 Gangalwadi Malegaon 810 1,273 +57.2%

Villages that shrank most in Washim district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Ganeshpur Risod 1,138 695 -38.9%
2 Tandali Mangrulpir 512 321 -37.3%
3 Walki Jahagir Washim 938 600 -36.0%
4 Ambapur Mangrulpir 193 135 -30.1%
5 Shelgaon Mangrulpir 951 680 -28.5%
6 Rajgaon Washim 1,070 804 -24.9%
7 Mangwadi Risod 2,392 1,836 -23.2%
8 Pasrani Karanja 1,511 1,171 -22.5%
9 Kondala Mahali Washim 1,117 885 -20.8%
10 Pimpla Malegaon 989 785 -20.6%
11 Umrala Washim 882 702 -20.4%
12 Soijana Manora 1,505 1,200 -20.3%
13 Supkhel Washim 2,194 1,754 -20.1%
14 Dongargaon Karanja 1,011 810 -19.9%
15 Chikhali Mangrulpir 1,481 1,204 -18.7%
16 Morgavhan Risod 1,431 1,175 -17.9%
17 DHANAJ (KD) Karanja 1,189 997 -16.1%
18 Sangaon Mangrulpir 1,788 1,510 -15.6%
19 Salambi Mangrulpir 553 468 -15.4%
20 Khadsing Washim 525 450 -14.3%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 2 excluded in total. How the limits are set.