Biggest population changes in Imphal East district
Computed from 108 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Imphal East district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purum Khunou(Koupak) | 182 | 426 | +134.1% |
| 2 | Monthou Keithelmanbi and Laikhong | 306 | 701 | +129.1% |
| 3 | Sadu Koireng (Sadu Yengkhuman Meitei and Nepali) | 456 | 1,030 | +125.9% |
| 4 | Takhok Makha | 601 | 1,352 | +125.0% |
| 5 | Moirang Kampu Sajeb | 1,333 | 2,897 | +117.3% |
| 6 | Pukhao Ahallup | 463 | 986 | +113.0% |
| 7 | Keikhu Kabui | 588 | 1,250 | +112.6% |
| 8 | Keibi Khullen and Khunou | 1,331 | 2,822 | +112.0% |
| 9 | Top Dusara Khabam | 1,942 | 4,059 | +109.0% |
| 10 | Pukhao Naharup | 1,479 | 2,965 | +100.5% |
| 11 | Khewa Company | 666 | 1,302 | +95.5% |
| 12 | Changamdabi Mathak Makha and Mamang | 6,419 | 12,227 | +90.5% |
| 13 | Takhel | 1,358 | 2,581 | +90.1% |
| 14 | Sarouthel | 132 | 241 | +82.6% |
| 15 | Kairang Meitei | 1,250 | 2,265 | +81.2% |
| 16 | Morok Ingkhol | 123 | 221 | +79.7% |
| 17 | Arapti(excluding N.A) | 1,495 | 2,673 | +78.8% |
| 18 | Lilong Kabui Shantipur | 738 | 1,295 | +75.5% |
| 19 | Khurai Khaidem Leikai | 2,724 | 4,646 | +70.6% |
| 20 | Urup | 4,990 | 8,489 | +70.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Imphal East district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keibi Kumuda and Chanung | 1,867 | 1,215 | -34.9% |
| 2 | Kongba Nongthombam (Thambalkhong Laishram Leikai) | 2,167 | 1,417 | -34.6% |
| 3 | Khundrakpam | 4,689 | 3,120 | -33.5% |
| 4 | Takhok Mapal (Awang) | 1,288 | 956 | -25.8% |
| 5 | Wangkhei Thambalkhong | 2,067 | 1,668 | -19.3% |
| 6 | Nandeibam Leikai North West bounded by Don BoscoRd | 3,375 | 2,835 | -16.0% |
| 7 | Sekta | 2,934 | 2,604 | -11.3% |
| 8 | Pourabi | 1,596 | 1,470 | -7.9% |
| 9 | Wakhong | 634 | 593 | -6.5% |
| 10 | Leitanpokpi | 1,025 | 1,000 | -2.4% |
| 11 | Iyampal(Yourbung Khunjao and Khunou) | 2,212 | 2,186 | -1.2% |
| 12 | Koirengei Meitei | 1,448 | 1,460 | +0.8% |
| 13 | Sinam | 1,015 | 1,030 | +1.5% |
| 14 | Top-Chingtha Laimanai | 4,985 | 5,090 | +2.1% |
| 15 | Nilakuthi | 1,357 | 1,407 | +3.7% |
| 16 | Tumukhong Moirang Purel | 2,572 | 2,682 | +4.3% |
| 17 | Nungoi | 2,452 | 2,560 | +4.4% |
| 18 | Kitna Pannung | 2,546 | 2,695 | +5.8% |
| 19 | Makeng Chonglou | 520 | 552 | +6.2% |
| 20 | Kakching | 742 | 792 | +6.7% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.