Biggest population changes in Jiribam district
Computed from 42 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Jiribam district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lalpani | 1,375 | 2,697 | +96.2% |
| 2 | Berabak | 175 | 340 | +94.3% |
| 3 | Mulargao | 836 | 1,562 | +86.8% |
| 4 | Babukhal | 118 | 184 | +55.9% |
| 5 | Champanagar Muslim | 590 | 865 | +46.6% |
| 6 | Kashimpur | 1,307 | 1,890 | +44.6% |
| 7 | Tilka Company | 219 | 311 | +42.0% |
| 8 | Jakuradhor Pt-I | 1,486 | 2,098 | +41.2% |
| 9 | Madhupur | 156 | 219 | +40.4% |
| 10 | Baibeni Bengali | 534 | 740 | +38.6% |
| 11 | Durgapur | 434 | 589 | +35.7% |
| 12 | Rasidpur | 210 | 285 | +35.7% |
| 13 | Choudhurikhal | 136 | 184 | +35.3% |
| 14 | Tupidhor | 180 | 243 | +35.0% |
| 15 | Abom Punjee Khasia | 191 | 254 | +33.0% |
| 16 | Ahamadabad | 1,816 | 2,367 | +30.3% |
| 17 | Jirimukh | 396 | 514 | +29.8% |
| 18 | Bhomikpara | 822 | 1,054 | +28.2% |
| 19 | Chandranathpur | 580 | 730 | +25.9% |
| 20 | Islamabad | 679 | 847 | +24.7% |
Villages that shrank most in Jiribam district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guakhal | 824 | 502 | -39.1% |
| 2 | Jakuradhor Part Ii | 1,171 | 753 | -35.7% |
| 3 | Dibong | 1,163 | 769 | -33.9% |
| 4 | Nungphou | 595 | 401 | -32.6% |
| 5 | Hilghat Khunou Gularthel | 2,286 | 1,679 | -26.6% |
| 6 | Nunkhal | 318 | 238 | -25.2% |
| 7 | Uchathel | 1,180 | 891 | -24.5% |
| 8 | Sonapur Pt I | 2,320 | 1,752 | -24.5% |
| 9 | Borobokra | 741 | 641 | -13.5% |
| 10 | Leishabithal Meitei | 231 | 221 | -4.3% |
| 11 | Chindong Leikai | 1,249 | 1,246 | -0.2% |
| 12 | Makhabosti | 575 | 580 | +0.9% |
| 13 | Harinagar Meitei | 421 | 441 | +4.8% |
| 14 | Binselu | 226 | 240 | +6.2% |
| 15 | Narayanpur | 464 | 524 | +12.9% |
| 16 | Kamaranga | 1,915 | 2,267 | +18.4% |
| 17 | Champanagar Meitei | 560 | 664 | +18.6% |
| 18 | Bakhal Ningthembam Nungchappi | 502 | 599 | +19.3% |
| 19 | Latingkhal | 1,525 | 1,833 | +20.2% |
| 20 | Lamabhutangkhal | 171 | 208 | +21.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.